exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Ballocks.Everything is political. Throwing the money changers out of the temple was a move against the Roman occupation of Judea.
Ballocks.Everything is political. Throwing the money changers out of the temple was a move against the Roman occupation of Judea.
Standard media grammar is not always a reliable reflection of reality.New country after Civil War - as Shelby Foote noted, before the Civil War the US was referred to in the plural in standard media grammar, after that War it was referred to in the singular.
I see your point. But I've been under the impression that the atomic bomb was not common knowledge - in fact, top secret. I can't believe the electorate at large was consulted on any of those ensuing decisions.the Hiroshima/Nagasaki decision was made over months by people on the "good guy" (not aggressor) side, with relevant principles involved and advocated, and with near complete information.
"Media" in this case includes letters from soldiers and families as published in local newspapers, writings preserved in family journals and records, speeches by politicians appealing to constituents, sermons delivered from pulpits (used to be bound in collections, with copies to local libraries and colleges), traveling shows, etc.Standard media grammar is not always a reliable reflection of reality.
Of course not. But lots of people were, at least informally, including many not in the official chain of command. Meanwhile the secrecy extended to the Japanese, thereby forestalling any chance of it affecting their decisions or abetting earlier surrender (as expected, the Japanese began surrendering as soon as they figured out what had happened to Hiroshima - information they could been provided as early as January of that year, even presented with the assembly of the first generation uranium gun design along with certainty of successful assembly of the second generation plutonium Bomb by March. The Russian command knew, the American command directly involved knew, everyone who was aware of American interest in uranium from newly captured sources in Africa et al knew: essentially, of the relevant parties only the Japanese command was kept in the dark - for reasons that aside from an assumption of utterly amoral practicality (testing both the new bombs on real cities with real hospitals and real schools and real women and children in them) made little sense then, and less now, the American command refused to confront the Japanese command with their unavoidable choice and fate as soon as possible.But I've been under the impression that the atomic bomb was not common knowledge - in fact, top secret. I can't believe the electorate at large was consulted on any of those ensuing decisions.
I concur.Christ was not a member of either Party, that year.
No, it wasn't, as the decision-makers were well aware. That was the cover story given to the American public, and it's worked its usual, insidious way into folk wisdom - what "everybody knows". There have been thousands of these tenets of faith deliberately injected into the public consciousness, through the education system, entertainment media and written history.It's possible to consider more than one factor when making an important decision. I do think that obtaining a surrender from the Japanese was a significant one.
Bullshit.No, it wasn't, as the decision-makers were well aware. That was the cover story given to the American public, and it's worked its usual, insidious way into folk wisdom - what "everybody knows". There have been thousands of these tenets of faith deliberately injected into the public consciousness, through the education system, entertainment media and written history.
This is the reason I give the voting population a partial pardon on its bad decisions.
Faith.Bullshit.
Months of worry about Russians, tightening blockade by Americans - intransigent defense of country and culture, no surrender.Believe it or not, the atomic bombs had little to do with the Japanese surrender.
They were more worried about the Russians.
Bipartisan bad faith and excuse mongering. Christ had no seat at that table.I don't know what this has to do with the topic.
Oh, and sorry for taking thread this off topic, for what it's worth, I think Christ would of been a member of the Green Party.
In quick succession - before the Japanese command could react to the first one.They dropped two bombs on them before they surrendered, hardly instant.
The Russians timed their attack to take advantage of the Bombs, grab as much as they could before the surrender they and every other knowledgable person considered inevitable.I imagine that it was a combination of events and maybe the Russian situation was the straw that broke the camels back as they say.
There is no thread topic per se. Bowser is trying to deflect bad stuff from the Republican Party and muddle the campaign rhetoric via a "bothsides" schtick.Understanding of history and culture. I don't know what this has to do with the topic.
Why?