Without doubt you are obfuscating. You cannot be that stupid that you compare 20 minutes of DAC film footage at 20FPS to a single image edited with MODERN software. If you do, you are really pathetic. Now answer properly!!
1. Massive area of many square miles, all grey soil, no vegetation. WHERE did all the grey soil come from, who pout it there, where is the paper trail. Where on Earth does that area exist with big mountains?
2.
Massive area of many square miles all evenly lit up and extremely bright. Your stupid claim doesn't work for a film sequence done in 1971.
I'm no authority but I found this in the comment section of this video. There were film projection techniques available that could have been used to keep the "distant" mountains in this video at a constant magnification as the rover drove toward the screen on which the mountain scenery was being projected.
I refer you to point 5. Also, what magical system keeps static mountains and backgrounds in all directions with no visible projection. It is clearly solid and has noticeable depth and shading.
3. Distant mountains never get any nearer. Now, try again!
Wouldn't that happen on an outdoor movie set doing what the above link explains?
The Moon is a retro-reflective surface, sending light back at source. When travelling down Sun, the reflection back is extremely bright. Across Sun, the brightness diminishes significantly. The Earth is NOT a retro-reflective surface.
4.
The whole reflectivity of the ground changes as the LRV changes across Sun. Identify where on Earth this could have occurred and how the surface would possibly do this!
I can't see what you're trying to prove here.
So you fire off your pathetic spammed videos that have already been debunked!
The point is that there are no cameras, projectors or anything visible on the entire surrounding area. How is that possible?
Pictures are fakable so there's no prove there.
Yes there is. The entire list of pictures counts 100% as proof. YOU are the joker who needs to PROVE they were faked. Good luck with that.
I don't know how many times I've posted this on this thread.
I'm sure you don't. You spam so much it is painful. Nothing in that useless video is an answer to the LRRR. I know your spam response, so I guess you just spammed the wrong cut and paste. PROVE they were unmanned. One single tiny piece of evidence. Paper trails on testing, development, launch, tracking, any single testimony or video or picture. You have zero. NOTHING. The evidence stands.
Lunar rover on the moon. Was it a RC model? (Extended Edition)
A fake non-expert and a moronic claim that the LRV footage is a model car. If you believe that you are way more stupid than you appear!
We read that a bunch of third parties tracked Apollo but did it really happen? Read this info about the media.
Third parties can be paid to lie. The US has a lot of control in the world.
Prove they lied. The evidence stands. You seem to think your ludicrous arm waving and insanely simplistic statements are proof that the evidence is suspect. You really have no clue how to assess evidence.
MoonFaker: Russia, Jodrell Bank & Frequencies. PART 1
The evidence stands.
It looks like footage of earth gravity shown in slow-motion.
The problem is that the soild to fall at Earth speed makes the astronauts move at crazy speeds. What things "look like" to you is clouded in your delusion and useless understanding.
You haven't shown anything that could be considered proof.
Yes I have, it all stands. Nothing you typed makes it go away. Your entire useless post is nothing but hot air with nothing concrete as rebuttal.
Nothing you've posted as "Proof" makes the anomalies that prove it was all faked go away.
None of the so called anomalies are unexplained. None of your crap observations and conclusions make the enormous amount of evidence go away. The missions occurred as history states.
The case was closed a long time ago. You people just won't recognize it.
Yes, but sadly for you, 10 years on and you still can't see it's you who is the fake.
You people also destroyed your credibility a long time ago by the stands you took on the Chinese spacewalk and Jay Windley's* analysis of the "Dust-free sand" issue.
Moron spam. You are the least credible person I have ever conversed with.
Anyone who thinks the flag moves in water like that is lying or incredibly dumb. I cannot accurately determine which.
