Thjere's a mountain of proof that the moon missions were faked and zero proof that they were real.
Stupidity is not a virtue. There are 842lbs of peer reviewed lunar samples, examined by thousands of geologists. In YOUR "armoury" you have a spammed website that demonstrates profound ignorance and some stupid Jarrah White videos already posted by you that show minor cabin contamination of soil and some claims of minor oxidisation. You do not understand any of it.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/a-...sappeared-are-back.163679/page-3#post-3653638
Five simple proofs:
- On the Jump Salute, the dust between his boots shows he cannot be on wire support. This proves he must be in low gravity.
- On Gene Cernan's approach to the rover, soil he kicks lands at the same time as he does. This proves he is not on wire support and must be in low gravity.
- On the Digging a Trench video soil ejected will only drop at Earth freefall when the speed of the video is adjusted to 245%. Motion looks absurd, proving it must be running at the correct speed at 100%.
- 842lbs of peer reviewed lunar samples, including 3 metre core samples. Impossible to fake, not meteorites and not from Earth.
- On the idiotic film American Moon a section shows a flat surface falling with no dust disturbance in the direction of fall. This proves they are in a vacuum and in a considerably massive one!
There you go, took me 5 minutes and you have no honest answer to any of those - all of them prove we landed on the Moon.
You can pretend all you want.
You are like the comedy cut and paste routine with your ridiculous responses. It is you in full denial. As "billvon" says, your useless mountain is a debunked dung heap, none of it remains.
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/
This guy is a paid sophist who knows the moon missions were faked.
You absurd person.
From that blog:
5. Miscellaneous: ".anyone who sees it will see that he's just a paid sophist."
This is probably the worst one of all. For this enormous diversionary statement, he gets to ignore every single thing written by an expert in almost every aspect of the Apollo Missions. He gets to ignore a concise website detailing debunks for almost all his total crap. He gets to ignore every post made where he always get his ass handed to him. The basis for this is his "credibility test".
Just recently he tried to discredit this analysis of an anomaly.
The Apollo Moon Jump Salute Refute hd
https://www.brighteon.com/a515dc75-83bb-4e02-aad9-b1cdfe0de150
You are such a disgraceful spammer you can't even remember where you scatter your bullshit. On this very forum:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/a-...sappeared-are-back.163679/page-3#post-3653418
Oh and the other trouble with you is that you are a quite appalling liar.
You CANNOT "put it on full screen" or slow it down - it is a gif!! Any honest eyes can view the parabolic arc between his boots and see it rise in time and begin to fall in time. This obviously doesn't include those in repetitious denial. Enhanced and slowed:
Totally and painfully obvious.
EVERY normal honest person sees the dust between his boots. A clear arc that rises to the same height in unison and falls also in unison. And wtf are you doing submitting this joker "chemist" making inept and ignorant physics observations?
Here's his attempt at discrediting it.
Moronic claim. It is his successful attempt at kicking your butt.
Let's hear your analysis of this.
I believe you have been advised many times not to divert to another forum! Your claim that the soil did not land in unison with him is bullshit. You are either selectively dishonest, blind as a bat, completely delusional or have a single digit IQ.
The sequence proves he is on the Moon.
Explain why you ignored this:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-latest-moon-hoax-documentary.163196/page-7#post-3645467
