Welcome to Conspiracies

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by James R, Oct 8, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Hey! Where did you get that photo of me?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. wlminex Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,587
    perhaps . . . just perhaps . . . this thread is a conspiracy!
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. MacGyver1968 Fixin' Shit that Ain't Broke Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,028
    Dang James...you're better looking than I thought!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Rick Perry.
    I have no doubt whatsoever that he would take part in a
    "Kill the Antichrist President for Jesus" conspiracy.
    Followed by a prayer meeting, and perhaps an execution or two.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Yip, Sounds like a perfect day.

    He makes the milfilicious Sarah look like a Liberal.

    I sometimes wonder if the Republicans don't come up with candidates like him just to scare us, and
    make the others seem more acceptable.

    Where else in the world would people cheer when you tell them how many people you have executed?
    Praise the Lord and pass the Pentathol!
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  8. cornel Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    137
    it is.

    there is only one reason why this sub-forum exists in the first place...

    TO FIND AND MONITOR THE CONSIRACY-BELIEVERS BEFORE THEY MANAGE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON ANYTHING TANGIBLE !!!
     
  9. MacGyver1968 Fixin' Shit that Ain't Broke Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,028
    Oh cool! It's our new sub-forum's first example of "Poe's Law"!
     
  10. suregeek Registered Member

    Messages:
    7
    YUM, Brain in a Vat! Cant wait..
     
  11. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Why does this subforum exist? Who created it? For what purpose?
     
  12. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Well, they have a little time then.
     
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    1. To give a home to conspiracy theories on sciforums.
    2. Me.
    3. To give a home to conspiracy theories on sciforums.
     
  14. Me-Ki-Gal Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,634
    I am a conspiritor so it is to late to stop Me . Even a bullet won't do it cause many have taken up my cause . Funny cause our web site even says " Something conspired . That is tittle of the blog post . Then it starts with My name

    Almost Like Gary knew it was Me . I try to keep it a secret that I conspire. Not anymore . You all know !! So the cat is out of the bag
     
  15. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    I noticed that 1. and 3. were repeated.

    Clearly, you're already running out of answers. Fess up.
     
  16. kx000 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,136
    Conspiracy is a stupid word, of course 9/11 was a conspiracy. Everything is a damn conspiracy. Me buying my car was a conspiracy between me my mother, father, and the car dealer ship. Yet, conspiracy theorist are made out to be bafoons by FOX, and CNN, etc, but when time comes to past and they were right no one even notices. Sad sad world which we live, LORD save us.
     
  17. portuswebs Registered Member

    Messages:
    15
    That make me feel better already
     
  18. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,549
  19. Petra Liverani Registered Member

    Messages:
    46
    I'm what many people would perceive as a hard-core conspiracy theorist, however, I don't think of myself that way at all for a number of reasons:
    • I only look at certain kinds of conspiracies known among my fellow disbelievers of official narratives as psychological operations or psyops.
    • Psyops have very distinctive features including that they're done "hidden in plain sight" so it's only a question of understanding psyop MO to see the evidence clearly thus theorising is not really an element except where analysts don't understand psyop MO properly and so get it half-wrong ... often the case unfortunately.
    • While I align with other disbelievers of official narratives in many ways I know that fundamentally there's a very big difference between me and the vast majority because I'm not guided by a bias to disbelieve but purely by the evidence and the essential rules of critical thinking. For example, I recognise the astonishing achievement of the moon landings while many others I tend to align with do not and anyone who doesn't recognise the reality of the moon landings is obviously not being guided by the evidence and essential rules of critical thinking.
    So what I'd like to suggest is a discussion about the rules of critical thinking and where people make errors in judgement because they haven't followed those rules properly.
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Petra:

    Welcome to sciforums. Could you please repost what you wrote as a new thread? This one dates back to 2011 and really ought to be closed.

    James R (Admin)
     
  21. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    The natural extension of this would seem to be "the more obvious something seems, the more likely it is to be a big coverup." Is that what you intended?
     
  22. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Sorry, billvon, but this discussion would be better off in another thread. I'm going to close this one.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page