What did Einstein mean by space-time being interwoven?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tyler Shaw said:
According to Hubble observation of the visual matter , the distant bodies are moving through space into more space and we are measuring a metric expansion of the distance between bodies .
Click to expand...
Incorrect. If you google misconceptions about the expansion of space, your assertion is number 1 or 2.
 
Tyler Shaw said:
My strange term is an Einstein term and he told us that space-time energy was interwoven with space
Click to expand...
Please supply a citation that supports this assertion, you could do that when you are looking up the other citation I asked for, bro.
 
origin said:
Please supply a citation that supports this assertion, you could do that when you are looking up the other citation I asked for, bro.
Click to expand...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

''In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold. ''


There you go bro , there is one of them .

Here is another link and quote :

''The expansion of the universe is the increase in distance between any two given gravitationally unbound parts of the observable universe with time.[1] It is an intrinsic expansion whereby the scale of space itself changes. The universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it.'' '

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe


That is false , a metric expansion is a physical motion and physical motion requires physical space !
 
Last edited:
Sean Carroll recommended this Arxiv paper (Tamara M. Davis Charles H. Lineweaver ) to help with confusion over expansion.
''Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the universe''
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808
In special relativity, redshifts arise directly from velocities. It was this idea that led Hubble in 1929 to convert the redshifts of the “nebulae” he observed into velocities, and predict the expansion of the universe with the linear velocity-distance law that now bears his name.
The general relativistic interpretation of the expansion interprets cosmological redshifts as an indication of velocity since the proper distance between comoving objects increases. However, the velocity is due to the rate of expansion of space, not movement through space, and therefore cannot be calculated with the special relativistic Doppler shift formula.
Click to expand...
 
foghorn said:
Sean Carroll recommended this Arxiv paper (Tamara M. Davis Charles H. Lineweaver ) to help with confusion over expansion.
''Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the universe''
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808
Click to expand...

Anyone who writes a paper that contests the expansion of space knows that paper would not be accepted . The paper link you provided is a ..''to keep the peace'' paper but also contradictory . A velocity is a motion , a speed and direction . The red-shift observed is of visual bodies , not of space . There is no evidence that space is red-shifting .
There is no reason the red-shift can't be related to the Doppler shift because the red-shift is surface emissions !
 
Tyler Shaw said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

''In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold. ''
There you go bro , there is one of them .
Click to expand...
Sorry dude, we all know what space-time is, the question I asked is what is this "space-time energy" that you used in this statement:
Tyler Shaw said:
did the dude mean space and space-time energy are indistinguishable
Click to expand...
Maybe you just misspoke?
Tyler Shaw said:
Here is another link and quote :

''The expansion of the universe is the increase in distance between any two given gravitationally unbound parts of the observable universe with time.[1] It is an intrinsic expansion whereby the scale of space itself changes. The universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it.'' '

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe


That is false , a metric expansion is a physical motion and physical motion requires physical space !
Click to expand...
So you are saying that this mainstream physics is wrong?
 
Tyler Shaw said:
There is no reason the red-shift can't be related to the Doppler shift because the red-shift is surface emissions !
Click to expand...
Actually there are many reasons that show space is expanding. Here are a few; the farther an object is from us the faster it's recession velocity, all distant objects (beyond our gravity bound galactic cluster) are moving away from us and the most distant objects have a recession velocity exceeding c.
 
origin said:
Sorry dude, we all know what space-time is, the question I asked is what is this "space-time energy" that you used in this statement:

Maybe you just misspoke?

So you are saying that this mainstream physics is wrong?
Click to expand...
I have read somewhere before bro the term space-time energy unless I dreamt I did bu anyhow bro space-time energy is the energy that is between bodies that is indistinguishable from space . Between you and the moon is space-time energy and this energy can curve bro towards masses , in fact bro I'd bet that bodies in motion are in motion because space-time energy curves towards the bodies direction and pulls the object along by space-time energy warping . Newton and Einstein laws of motion bro , a body in motion will remain in motion because of space-time energy curvature . Far fetched maybe bu sounds rather cool .
 
Tyler Shaw said:
I have read somewhere before bro the term space-time energy unless I dreamt I did bu anyhow bro space-time energy is the energy that is between bodies that is indistinguishable from space . Between you and the moon is space-time energy and this energy can curve bro towards masses , in fact bro I'd bet that bodies in motion are in motion because space-time energy curves towards the bodies direction and pulls the object along by space-time energy warping . Newton and Einstein laws of motion bro , a body in motion will remain in motion because of space-time energy curvature . Far fetched maybe bu sounds rather cool .
Click to expand...
What happened to "pal", Jimmy?
 
Tyler Shaw said:
I have read somewhere before bro the term space-time energy unless I dreamt I did bu anyhow bro space-time energy is the energy that is between bodies that is indistinguishable from space . Between you and the moon is space-time energy and this energy can curve bro towards masses , in fact bro I'd bet that bodies in motion are in motion because space-time energy curves towards the bodies direction and pulls the object along by space-time energy warping . Newton and Einstein laws of motion bro , a body in motion will remain in motion because of space-time energy curvature . Far fetched maybe bu sounds rather cool .
Click to expand...
That is just word salad. Are you a sock puppet of a banned former member, per chance??
 
origin said:
That is just word salad. Are you a sock puppet of a banned former member, per chance??
Click to expand...
wa you talking about dude ? That isn't what you call word salad at all , perhaps it is beyond your comprehension ? Bro , between you and any object do you observe a metric measure of space ? If you live on Earth in that metric volume exists space-time energy (quantum fields) . You can not see this space-time energy because it is transparent and does not affect light .

OK now bro , you got that ?
 
Tyler Shaw said:
Spoiling a good thread ma dear can you kindly move on , rather chat than be in love .
Click to expand...
This a horrible thread. You say silly stuff, you get correct, you ignore the correction and say more silly stuff.

Just like the last time you were here as a sock puppet...
 
Kristoffer said:
Good thread? Nah, but I'll leave you to ramble on until you get booted.
Click to expand...
We'd hardly warmed up in this thread ma dear , why not stick around and you might learn something that you misunderstood from your education .

Do you know that your own neurological reference frame is corrupted by trying to improve that what was presented before our time in the incorrect context ?

The big bang theory based on Einsteins space-time and so on which has lead to Chinese whispers and misunderstandings by the populous .
Space is not expanding , that is a misconception of the populous , proper scientists know this .
 
Jerimiah! That was the previous iteration of this guy.
Same nutty style.
And I wouldn't waste my time reading your stuff btw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top