It's dishonest.Why don’t you answer the question?
Why don't you answer mine? Mine's at least relevant - you are claiming experts in field without expertise: how do you manage that?
It's dishonest.Why don’t you answer the question?
So if you have two experts, how do you conclude that one is a better, or real expert, compared to the other expert?
The premise contains an if.Why don’t you answer the question?
What does religion do for mankind that the statement "Be kind" doesn't do better?
Is the corollary true?Provides a route to salvation (in some religions at least).
Provides a route to salvation (in some religions at least).
Provides a metaphysics, a view of ultimate reality and the human individual's place in the big picture.
Creates a (mythical) context for events here on Earth, making historical and life events seem meaningful and not just 'one damn thing after another'.
Prescribes a means for inner transformation, ranging from ethical and/or ritual practice through many forms of meditation.
Motivates much of humanity's greatest art.
It can be done, but most of us don't need those things provided for us.Apart from a route to salvation (in some religions at least).
none of this can be done by Atheists???
Maybe there's a realization that we don't need "salvation" - like thinking you're drowning and praying to the lifeguard, and then realizing that you can just stand up.Apart from a route to salvation (in some religions at least).
none of this can be done by Atheists???
Well, what rational person thinks they will be immersed in fire and brimstone for eternity? Salvation presupposes something to be saved from.Maybe there's a realization that we don't need "salvation" - like thinking you're drowning and praying to the lifeguard, and then realizing that you can just stand up.
SIN, original, heritable, unatonableSalvation presupposes something to be saved from.
If you don't believe in the sin, you don't need saving.1 Corinthians 15:21 -For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
22 - For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
The question that spawned this reference to salvation was M345's, where he mentioned atheism. There is no sin for atheists. Sin is specifically divine judgment (that's the definition). Atheists may certainlySIN, original, heritable, unatonable
I know. As I said above, it's a question of need.divine sin is incompatible with any meaningful atheist view.
Actually you DO make positive connections to anything with philosophy ... if philosophy had a job description, that would be it.You don’t make positive connections to anything solely using philosophy and history, if said examples don’t stand up to a reasonable standard of acceptance, then they must be characterized accordingly. Medical practitioners demonstrably treat and cure patients, religious authorities can’t demonstrate a reasonable connection to a supernatural deity.
I can only reject that which has been presented. Supply an example of what you deem credible and we can discuss the validity of your assertion.
The point is that you wouldn't bother trying to establish the difference between eating a pineapple and your car. These are the sorts of questions that come from the seriously deranged or someone playing some sort of cerebral game that culminates in wasting time.The point is that if there is a difference, I can show the difference. You claim there is a difference between crystal-rubbing and God-bothering but you refuse to cite the differences.
It may be a necessary evil or the best use of a bad bargain, but, in practical spheres, equating the law with kindness is a slippery slope.Yes. It's "do unto others as you would have others do unto you." I would like to be given the protection of the law, so I also want others to have the protection of the law, even murderers.
It's seen that there is a popular distinction between religion and spirituality. People seem to take religion as rules and regs, formalities etc and spirituality as developing higher qualities born of self control or introspection (like kindness, for example).Is the corollary true?
That one could worship God without the religion and one would not enjoy salvation?
That is what I am asking Yazata, yes.It's seen that there is a popular distinction between religion and spirituality. People seem to take religion as rules and regs, formalities etc and spirituality as developing higher qualities born of self control or introspection (like kindness, for example).
Is this al9ng the same lines of what you are trying to say?
I heard it differently: the most religious people in the world - jihadist Muslims - celebrated that fire. It seemed to them the triumph of their (true) god over your (false) god - both of whom like to show off with fancy houses, but neither cares much about kindness.Classic case in point with the atheists guffawing over the destruction of the notre dam cathedral.
Sure I would. All you had to do was ask:The point is that you wouldn't bother trying to establish the difference between eating a pineapple and your car.
Slide away. Show us the difference.It may be a necessary evil or the best use of a bad bargain, but, in practical spheres, equating the law with kindness is a slippery slope.