What is Our Universe

G

georgi_zlatev

Registered Member
The Scientist is looking for higgs boson.This partical can not exist because we can make conclusion what is small than this partical.The smallest partical is wave.We can make supposition that partrical is two waves positive and negative.They attract each other and form the mass.Is our Universe without end?Over our universe there is field.This field make positive and negative waves exist and to form mass.
 
Is our Universe endless.No it is surrounded by field .This is the only explanation ,in contrary the Universe shall always be expanding.If we think what is beyond the space if the answer is space what is beyond that space if it is substance what is beyond that substance.The only answer is that Universe is surrounded by field .
 
There is no such thing as higgs boson because as much as little it is arise the question can it be devide into small pieces.The smallest particle is composed by two waves positive and negative which attract each other and create the mass.
 
Hey thanks for writting exactly the same thing in the Alternative Theories section that you wrote in the Math & Physics. I didn't understand it the first time you wrote it but now that you wrote exactly the same thing twice, well as expected, I understand what you are saying completely.

So now that I completely understand what you wrote, I feel that I can give a clear opinion. What you have here is a huge fetid pile of pure unadulterated horse crap.
 
If higgs boson exists the answer can higgs boson be devided into small pieces is positive.Also this pieces being material can also be devided into small pieces and this is without end.The only answer of this problem is higgs boson to be made of waves.
 
georgi_zlatev said:
If higgs boson exists the answer can higgs boson be devided into small pieces is positive.
Click to expand...

No it is a Boson, so it is a elementary particle.

Also this pieces being material can also be devided into small pieces and this is without end
Click to expand...
.

No, it cannot be divided it is a boson, remember? If you have some evidence to the contrary please present it and collect your Nobel Prize!

The only answer of this problem is higgs boson to be made of waves.
Click to expand...

There is no problem. You made up a problem that does not exist. All particles have a wave like aspect to them AFAIK.
 
I think that i am misunderstood.Let accept that higgs boson is smallest material particle.Even smallest particle higgs boson is big compared with free space which means that higgs boson can be devided into small material particle except higgs boson is made by waves.
 
If higgs boson is material partical it can be devided because even the smallest material partical is bigger than the free space.This mean that the smallest material partical is made by waves.
 
4-fold "U"niverse

"U"niverse =;

1) non-occupied space( infinite )

2) occupied space( finite ).

It just doesn't get any simpler than that.

r6
 
"U"niverse = Most Wholistic Concept/Scenario

"U"niverse = Most (W)holistic Concept/Scenario

Finite Universe = occupied space ergo fermions( matter ), bosons( force ) and quasi-physical gravity, which is considered to be a bosonic force, but it is of the odd-bird-out catagory of bosons ie.. because it is so weak it is ultra-micro and will never ever be quantized, tho Lee Smolin projected that, by around 2015 humans would quantify gravity via a geometric method.

It doesn't get any simpler than that. ;)

r6


rr6 said:
"U"niverse =;
1) non-occupied space( infinite )
2) occupied space( finite ).
It just doesn't get any simpler than that.
r6
Click to expand...
 
rr6 said:
"U"niverse = Most (W)holistic Concept/Scenario

Finite Universe = occupied space ergo fermions( matter ), bosons( force ) and quasi-physical gravity, which is considered to be a bosonic force, but it is of the odd-bird-out catagory of bosons ie.. because it is so weak it is ultra-micro and will never ever be quantized, tho Lee Smolin projected that, by around 2015 humans would quantify gravity via a geometric method.

It doesn't get any simpler than that. ;)

r6
Click to expand...

I like five islands dressing on salad. Please note for next time.
 
rr6 said:
"U"niverse = Most (W)holistic Concept/Scenario

Finite Universe = occupied space ergo fermions( matter ), bosons( force ) and quasi-physical gravity, which is considered to be a bosonic force, but it is of the odd-bird-out catagory of bosons ie.. because it is so weak it is ultra-micro and will never ever be quantized, tho Lee Smolin projected that, by around 2015 humans would quantify gravity via a geometric method.

It doesn't get any simpler than that. ;)

r6
Click to expand...

You cited Lee Smolin. Check this link :http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-lee-smolin-is-immoral-double-faced.html

Mr. rr6, : "It just doesn't get any simpler than that."
 
Last edited:
Moderation of Frequency and Angle

Or as Fuller states it.."what we have is moderation/modification of frequency and angle".....

V - angle aka mininal viewpoint

VvVv = frequency
The minimal solid of Universe can never be less than three nodal-vertexial events integrated with a central/nuclear nodal-vertexial event, i.e. a subdivided triangular space having;

6 periphal angles

3 central angles

4 nodal-vertexial events

6 vectorial lines-of-relationship

To have a graviton, then we need to envision a triangular di-pyramid at minimium;

https://www.google.com/search?q=tri...MEaeH2AXsu4H4BA&ved=0CDEQsAQ&biw=1193&bih=575

ergo;

5 nodal-vertexial events--at minimum--;

18 surface angles,

9 vectorial lines-of-relationship

1 central nodal-vertexial event as axial spinal chord.

This above is the static concept of a graviton, if we envision a more dynamic graviton then we replace the single nodal-vertexial event at each end with three nodal-vertexial events i.e.

3-3-3 or one set of three that expands and contracts overtime.

Ex. 3-3-3-3-3-3-3

Expand-contract-expand-contract etc...... and this defines a tube that is liken to a snake that swallows large rodent and the snakes body expands in those ares as the rodent passes through then those areas contract.

Central to this gravitonic tube is a central axis liken to a spinal chord or so I believe. ;)

r6



rr6 said:
"U"niverse = Most (W)holistic Concept/Scenario
Finite Universe = occupied space ergo fermions( matter ), bosons( force ) and quasi-physical gravity, which is considered to be a bosonic force, but it is of the odd-bird-out catagory of bosons ie.. because it is so weak it is ultra-micro and will never ever be quantized, tho Lee Smolin projected that, by around 2015 humans would quantify gravity via a geometric method.
r6
Click to expand...
 
The thing is though the Universe is Not about geometry , it is about energy

Quote from Paul A. LaViolette's book SubQuantum Kinetics , pg 275

quote

" Coupling between electrostatic and gravitational fields is predicted neither by general relativity , nor by conventional field theory "

Hence geometry in the conventional sense , as it relates to the Universe is irrelevant really
 
Z Tube with an Axial Chord as the Solidity of Gravitonic Space

rr6 said:
Or as Fuller states it.."what we have is moderation/modification of frequency and angle".....
Ex. 3-3-3-3-3-3-3
Click to expand...

v-v-v-v-v-v-v

ex-pan-sion-con-trac-tion-

Electro-mangetic Tube = Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z

What we have, is moderation/modification of ultra-micro, geodesic great tubes, of various diameters/radius that are minimally viewed as geodesic arcs all which have a potential for interference as more medio-macro associated fermions and bosons.

r6
 
rr6 said:
v-v-v-v-v-v-v

ex-pan-sion-con-trac-tion-

Electro-mangetic Tube = Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z

What we have, is moderation/modification of ultra-micro, geodesic great tubes, of various diameters/radius that are minimally viewed as geodesic arcs all which have a potential for interference as more medio-macro associated fermions and bosons.

r6
Click to expand...

Ignorant gibberish
 
georgi_zlatev said:
There is no such thing as higgs boson because as much as little it is arise the question can it be devide into small pieces.The smallest particle is composed by two waves positive and negative which attract each other and create the mass.
Click to expand...
Particles, fundamental particles, have zero size. Or more accurately they are modelled as zero size objects and all data is currently consistent with that notion. The Higgs boson is not smaller nor larger than the electron, it is much more massive however, almost 300,000 times more massive (500 KeV compared to about 140 GeV = 140,000,000 KeV).

georgi_zlatev said:
Let accept that higgs boson is smallest material particle.
Click to expand...
Which no particle physicist, theorist or experimentalist, has ever said.

rr6 said:
v-v-v-v-v-v-v

ex-pan-sion-con-trac-tion-

Electro-mangetic Tube = Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z
Click to expand...
I simply cannot believe you are not a troll just pretending to be stupid. No one can post that and believe they are being coherent. No one without need of medical attention in some way at least...
 
3-fold + time i.e. XYZ + T

Quasi-physical ultra-micro gravity

Fermions--aka fermionic matter

Bosons---where gravity is sometimes listed---aka bosonic forces.


The 3 exist above is a finite occupied space aka Universe i.e. all three of the above any combinations thereof.

Simple to grasp complex to operate...:)

Trolls need not apply.

r6
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top