Why the Scipowers are idiots.

Status
Not open for further replies.

WANDERER

Banned
Banned
Why Stryder and all these wannabe intellectual midgets are really retarded.

1-They attempt to protect individuals from insult and in so doing imply that the only reality allowed is the one which is inoffensive. They are fagots.

2-They take on this air of objective justice while they project their petty and simplistic moralities and cultural ideals upon all opinions. Imbeciles with an agenda. They are hypocrites.

3-They are stupid. 'Nough said.

4-They limit discourse to 'acceptable' or institutionally sanctioned viewpoints, thusly limiting the discussions to ruminations and parroting, with accompanying sources, and eliminating all personal perspectives. An entire forum dedicated to regurgitating. How original.

5- KingJames R,etard is a girlish imbecile who can only stand up to a challenge by banning it.

6-Guztav, a.k.a. spookz, a.k.a. Lord of the Flies has replaced substance with style, as his saving grace. He/She/It puts more effort in how he/she/it will say soemthing rather than what it will say. In so doing it shows itself to be nothing more than a stylish idiot with a thesaurus.

7-The entire forum of SciKindom is populated by simplistic and mediocre minds. As a result a general environment of bored repetition and simplistic threads is promoted, pretending to be serious and deep discourse.

8-Spuriousmonkey is an asshole. Undeniable.

9-In their attempt to create an environment of serious exchange of ideas they have projected their pretentious ideals upon their little hypocritical internet world and have constructed a mirror image of the culture around them. They are indoctrinated.

10-This forum sucks. Why say more?
 
If it sucks so bad why not remove yourself from it? Or better yet, if your so smart why not try starting some discussions that stray from the "boring repetition" that you see, instead of complaining about it why not actively try to change the enviroment here. If you powers of argument are so great then you should be able to shame those mods who you say claim to be so superior through the power of argument and reasoning, not the power of the insult which you seem more than happy to use.
 
Wanderer.

Quit your depression outbursts and respond to my post in the Human Science to your thread "Hypersensitivity." I thought I tried to post something of value there, and apparently it is being "dismissed."


`
 
I agree with wanderer but he forgot to point out that they are faggots
They are fagots.
Oh, sorry, my mistake.

I don't want to upset you anymore than you already are, but why hang out here then ??
He wants it fixed? It's not a huge insurmountable problem that calls for surrender, it's as simple as "stop being idiot faggots" and then everything will be fine.
Punish inane mediocre posts rather than original and intelligent but potentially offensive posts.
Mods are seives selecting what the final product of sciforums will become, and they are actively trying to ruin it by A) allowing threads asking what's in our handbags and B) disallowing threads asking us to think about differences between the various strains of homo sapiens.
Both just examples, across the board as a general rule conforming mediocrity is encouraged and original provocative ideas are discouraged, so the mods are either sinister jew conspiracies actively trying to make sciforums the faceless facebook, or they are clumsy incompetent morons accidentally making sciforums the faceless facebook.

Either way anyone who cares would stand up and resist the destruction of sciforums.
Leaving won't help.
I'm ashamed of myself for tip toeing around on eggshells to avoid a ban, that's not really helping either.

Wanderer is nothing short of a sciformerican patriot for speaking up about this heart breaking problem.
 
Why Stryder and all these wannabe intellectual midgets are really retarded.

Stryder and all the wannabe intellectual midgets might be retarded but they're damn good in the sack.

1-They attempt to protect individuals from insult and in so doing imply that the only reality allowed is the one which is inoffensive. They are fagots.

You are like Stryder, Reiku, and Sandy all rolled up into one. See? Nobody's protecting you from insult.

2-They take on this air of objective justice while they project their petty and simplistic moralities and cultural ideals upon all opinions. Imbeciles with an agenda. They are hypocrites.

What? You mean you don't do the same?

3-They are stupid. 'Nough said.

And they smell like fish.

4-They limit discourse to 'acceptable' or institutionally sanctioned viewpoints, thusly limiting the discussions to ruminations and parroting, with accompanying sources, and eliminating all personal perspectives. An entire forum dedicated to regurgitating. How original.

Originality alert!

5- KingJames R,etard is a girlish imbecile who can only stand up to a challenge by banning it.

And you can't. Haha!


6-Guztav, a.k.a. spookz, a.k.a. Lord of the Flies has replaced substance with style, as his saving grace. He/She/It puts more effort in how he/she/it will say soemthing rather than what it will say. In so doing it shows itself to be nothing more than a stylish idiot with a thesaurus.

Do I detect a hint of jealousy.

7-The entire forum of SciKindom is populated by simplistic and mediocre minds. As a result a general environment of bored repetition and simplistic threads is promoted, pretending to be serious and deep discourse.

So what do you want to talk about? Niggers? Retards? Fags? Anus? Skinning muslims alive, drinking their blood, and screwing the remains?

8-Spuriousmonkey is an asshole. Undeniable.

Is he tight or over-fucked?

9-In their attempt to create an environment of serious exchange of ideas they have projected their pretentious ideals upon their little hypocritical internet world and have constructed a mirror image of the culture around them. They are indoctrinated.

10-This forum sucks. Why say more?

So, how are you going to make it better? What brave original ideas do you have to dicuss science, deep topics, and weed out the dregs of spamming, trolling, etc. entropy?
 
Yeah. We should give an applause to Wanderer. No fucking doubt about it ;)

Either way we look at it though, it sucks that he isn't gonna respond to our posts.
I'd have to say that, .. well I shouldn't say it.
Perhaps we should give him a big hug.

And allow him moderate securety here. Minus his totally insane commentary.
 
So what do you want to talk about? Niggers? Retards? Fags? Anus? Skinning muslims alive, drinking their blood, and screwing the remains?
This guy gets it.
Although I wouldn't put my dick in a skinned muslim, I RESPECT YOUR RIGHT TO DO SO.

Wanderer
6-Guztav, a.k.a. spookz, a.k.a. Lord of the Flies has replaced substance with style, as his saving grace. He/She/It puts more effort in how he/she/it will say soemthing rather than what it will say. In so doing it shows itself to be nothing more than a stylish idiot with a thesaurus.
I missed this bit.
Where does he look like he's using a thesaurus?
See I wouldn't have even bothered complaining about spooks, maybe you can respond to this plea of mine;
I find it peculiar he warrants a mention with those posters.
It's not that I dislike him, there's not enough to dislike, he doesn't do anything.
Was there a time when gustav or "spooks" went balistic on every motherfucker? And now is too jaded to bother?
He's sure been resting on his laurels for a while. I've been here for the better part of this millenium and haven't seen anything.
But it's not just you who acts like he has merit, so I don't think you're a deluded maniac, lots of people seem to put him up on a pedestal, so he must have done something worthwhile, but when, and what was it?
Maybe it's because I'm in a different timezone, I have caught him editting and deleting his posts, maybe while I'm asleep he writes huge awesome posts, and then before I wake he whittles them down into a few words telling some female she's lovely?
That would be interesting and ingenius, off the wall conceptual abstract art, his "props" are fair enough if he is doing that.

This is sincere curiousity, not criticism.
Often people like stuff that sucks and I'll criticise them, but I do this from the vantage point of understanding why they like what they like, and understanding why they are wrong for liking it.
This is different, I don't understand.
I don't get it, I have a flaw where I lack the capacity to comprehend the brilliance of spooks.

I find it interesting to experience what I see other people experience all the time- not getting something.
It's cloudy and mysterious.
What's going on? I don't know.
In my mind it's like it's simply not happening. Gustav just isn't doing anything good. That's how it feels, but I'm switched on just enough to gather this isn't the case.

It's been insightful to experience not getting something, but it's been plaguing me for years now and I want out of the haze.
What is he doing?
Can one of you sly smirkers who are on the gustav train tap me on the shoulder and whisper the secret in my blind buffoonish ear?
 
10-This forum sucks. Why say more?

And you are so intelligent and so clever, you still post here.

Hmmmm..:scratchin:

Seeing how you are so superior in your intelligence, oh masterful one, might I suggest a dictionary?
6-Guztav, a.k.a. spookz, a.k.a. Lord of the Flies has replaced substance with style, as his saving grace. He/She/It puts more effort in how he/she/it will say soemthing rather than what it will say. In so doing it shows itself to be nothing more than a stylish idiot with a thesaurus.

Oh! I am sorry. I forgot we were meant to be bowing down to your superior intellect.

*Bows down*

We are not worthy... We are NOT worthy..:worship:


Anywho..

I take you are well? Getting much sleep?:p
 
WANDERER;1741079 10-This forum sucks. Why say more?[/QUOTE said:
And yet, you still come here and post when you're not banned.

Methinks that says more about your pathetic nature than it does anyone on this forum. You do realize that if you just went ahead and killed yourself, you really wouldn't be missed, don't you? I don't say that lightly. You really are that useless, in the eyes of most. When Mr. Sinatra coined the term "oxygen thief", he had you in mind. Good day.
 
Wanderer, all those reason are not why they are retarded. They describe how we know that they are retarded. Number 4 is my favorite.

Consider at least two of the things that they will defend come what may. Feminism and environmentalism started out with adult children attacking their betters. Feminists terrorized men, the environmentalists terrorized everyone who ate or used electricity. Then they did what they could to shut up anyone who protested their tactics. To this day their aura of respectability is still propped up by people who shout others down, shut them up when possible, who accuse people of criminal behavior if they oppose the "lofty goals" of the movements.
 
Consider at least two of the things that they will defend come what may. Feminism and environmentalism started out with adult children attacking their betters. Feminists terrorized men,

Do you think men are better women?
 
Do you think men are better women?

God I hope that men are not "better women."

If you really want to get technical about it, I am talking about asymmetrical warfare. This is practiced by individuals and groups who feel that they are attacking a more powerful force, aka "their betters." In the cases of environmentalists (including animal rights posers) and for some reason in the case of feminists, these groups want power at the same time that they claim that the existing power structure is corrupt, largely because said structure has power. They started out using abusive methods to gain that power, although I suppose you can qualify this by saying one thing that is true, that neither movement was actually much known. Most people don't know the actual time that either movement began, but both movements were far more beneficial before Gloria Steinem or Edward Abbey. It seems to me that the feminists of Margaret Mead's time were far more based in reality, and conservationists who worked to preserve forests and populations of animals were around for sixty years before "environmentalists" started bombing college campuses. About the time of Gloria Steinem those movements went tits up, no pun intended.

Similarly, several of the moderators here are using similar methods to dispose of superior logic and facts.
 
Well you are meant to be my 'better'. You tell me!:p

I am a male in his late 40s, significantly overweight, with asthma and a heart condition, and there is a better than 90 percent chance that I can beat any female adult, chosen at random, at any test of strength and endurance.

Even so, what I am talking about is women "playing the victim" to look for pity. Now I'm supposedly an attacker if I render an honest opinion that puts women in a bad light. On the other hand I could accuse men of being virulent rapists with limp penises all day and not get a peep of protest.
 
Bringing it home: The behavior of animal rights activists, environmental activists, a lot of scientists, AIDS activists, and yes, feminists, has been such that their credibility has been destroyed with anyone who actually uses an analytical and skeptical mind to rate their credibility. Each named group sticks with repeatedly debunked fallacious "facts" and reasoning, threatens and silences critics, and gets worse every time someone demands that they explain themselves and why their views don't match readily observable realities.

And they whine.
 
I am a male in his late 40s, significantly overweight, with asthma and a heart condition, and there is a better than 90 percent chance that I can beat any female adult, chosen at random, at any test of strength and endurance.

Like running up a hill for a mile?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top