Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Write4U, Oct 3, 2023.

  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    No it isn't.
    The student does not make up their own ideas based on internet Googling and then demand the tutor correct them.
    If the student wants to learn, the student is obliged to start from proper first principles.

    And now you've just had you first error pointed out and why it is an error.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    No, that is not a correction of a factually identified error in content or understanding.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    [QUOTE "Pinball1970, post: 3719847, member: 291587"][QUOTE="Write4U, post: 3719845, member: 261885"
    So far you have not shown me anything about the universe other than available science.
    New perspectives, like Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH)

    Mathematics: The Beautiful Language of the Universe
    JUNE 6, 2015 BY JOSHUA CARROLL
    https://www.universetoday.com/120681/mathematics-the-beautiful-language-of-the-universe/[/QUOTE]
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2023
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Thus, you have zero intention of learning anything new.

    You take zero responsibility for your own ignorance.
    Which is why you are a lost cause - and told so by virtually everyone who tries to engage with you.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  8. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,532
    Folks, this will go nowhere. Write4U can keep this sort of crap going indefinitely, chucking in a tangential internet quote periodically, asking meaningless questions, mangling terminology, etc. It's like Theorist: the game seems to be just to keep a dialogue going, however idiotic - while working in, on the flimsiest pretext, his various idées fixes: Bohm's "implicate order" metaphysics, Tegmark's mathematical universe, anything to do with functions, potentials or differential equations (none of which he has the remotest clue about), microtubules.........
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2023
    James R, Pinball1970 and DaveC426913 like this.
  9. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    That is not a logical assumption.
     
  10. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    A rich palette! Why are you complaining?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2023
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    It is not an assumption. You are on record as having been led by the nose to innumerable facts that correct your erroneous notions - not just by members, but by moderators as well - and you are on record as having repeated the same mistakes over and over again.
    That is not an assumption; that is your history.
     
  12. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    No, you are exaggerating the issue. There is a record of ad hominem remarks, but when there was an honest correction or question about a term or phrase, I have always endeavored to explain the context in which I used a particular term.

    The record shows that when there was correction directly pertinent to the subject I have thanked the poster and not repeated the original mistake again.

    For the rest of what you consider word salad, it is suggestive of lazy thinking and avoiding unpacking the string and looking at the compound description.
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    The problem is that, since you are so very ignorant (a fact that can be objectively measured by the sheer number and frequency of words you do not understand and therefore misuse), you are not in a position to know when you are wrong. For the vast majority of times you have been wrong, you are simply unable to see it because of your (objectively measurable) ignorance of the subjects.

    The way you can start to see this for yourself is to ask yourself if anyone - anyone - here that you are directly engaging with - agrees with you. No. That's because the rest of us actually do know the science and we all know you don't just have it wrong, you are - as Pauli put it - "not even wrong". You are that far from reality.


    I'm not just trying to beat up on you or make you feel bad. You need to stop burning your time and everyone else's with this echo chamber of your own devising. It is damaging to you and the world. All forms of ignorance and misinformation are. Either learn some actual science from the ground up, or abandon it altogether and build birdhouses instead.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
    Pinball1970 likes this.
  14. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    And exactly what do you have the answers to, when you do not care to try and understand the thrust of my arguments.

    You are a perfect example of the old school, rooted in the enigma of Quantum and GR, to which science still does not have an answer, except for "shut up and calculate".

    I don't need to calculate the variables in order to understand an equation in principle.
    That you don't understand me does not bother me in the least.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    I'd say we have yet to see you understand any equation, in principle or otherwise. eg. "differential equation" is just Greek to you. Yet you keep employing it as if you understand it, despite being repeatedly told otherwise.

    You have a responsibility as a human being to assert things you know about - not things you don't know about. To spread information, not disinformation and ignorance.
    To continue to do this is the definition of malicious trolling.
     
  16. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    And, pray tell what alerts you to the fact that I don't know what a differential equation is?

    Quote the instance where I made my terminal error. You must allow me to respond or you are just another elitist trying to impress the crowd.

    Tell me. does this guy know what differential equations are? I don't have any problems understanding what he is explaining.


    I do not NEED to know the maths. Just what it IS and how it works in general.



    And it is up to you to prove I am trolling. Just making ad hominem accusations is slander on your part. You may want to be careful with that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
  17. Pinball1970 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,044

    “I see a common denominator between that 2nd Law and SOL, they are both universal constants, no?

    Are they both subject to the same rules that govern quantum?”


    This is an example of “not even wrong.”

    The second law is not a universal constant, it is not even a constant, the statement makes no sense.


    “rules that govern quantum”


    You do not know the formalism or understand quantum mechanics.


    “Bohmian Pilot Wave”


    You do not know the formalism or understand quantum mechanics.


    “..rooted in the enigma of Quantum and GR, to which science still does not have an answer, except for "shut up and calculate"”


    Which answer? Quantum mechanics and General relativity are very well understood and explain a good deal of the universe we live in and make accurate predictions.

    “Shut up and calculate” refers to QM not General Relativity, which I am sure you are not familiar with either.


    “According to the laws of entropy, does heat flow decay from high frequency wave lengths to low frequency wavelengths?”


    Your first question kind of sums this up, there are three major misconceptions just in that one question.


    This shows a complete lack of understanding of thermodynamics, Quantum mechanics, general relativity and classical wave theory.


    This is what I mean by profound misconceptions.


    So you have a choice, you can either pick and mix you tube posts and continue to get mixed up and learn nothing, OR you can get a book on some basics and do some work.

    It is far far harder to take the second option.
     
    James R and exchemist like this.
  18. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
  19. Pinball1970 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,044
    You have ignored the main point of my post to you and asked another rather silly question. What does "respond to" mean?
    I already told you that many branches of physics have calculus as tools (to calculate things)
    I think I have tried to be polite but firm with your questions so I will leave it here.
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Done.

    I don't need to prove it to you. You are, after all, walking like a duck and talking like a duck, and not interested in the fact that everyone (none of whom are ducks) is trying to tell you you're acting like a duck.


    Indeed, I am quite careful with that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
  21. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    Make up your mind. A duck is not a troll.

    "click"
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2023
  22. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    I'll ignore the ad hominem for now and answer the real question.

    Not all differential equations have solutions; nor is the question of existence purely mathematical but if a meaningful physical problem is correctly formulated mathematically as a differential equation, then the mathematical problem should have a solution.

    In the best of all possible worlds we know the laws of physics perfectly and can write them as differential equations (or something similar). But we do not live in that world.
    Instead we create models of the physical world that may not correspond to the actual laws (due to ignorance or just approximation).
    Bijection

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    A bijective function, f: X → Y, where set X is {1, 2, 3, 4} and set Y is {A, B, C, D}. For example, f(1) = D.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijection#

    Multivalued function
    .....
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivalued_function
     
  23. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,085
    What do you think I meant to say here? Try to be generous.
     

Share This Page