SAM:
The thread was closed because it was deliberately intended to inflame. This is trolling behaviour.
It is quite possible that, had you framed your thread in a less inflammatory way, some kind of useful discussion might have been possible.
??? Israel goes fascist. They elected a Prime Minister who does not believe in the Palestinian state and now have a foreign minister who calls for the execution of Palestinians who will not swear fealty to their occupiers and promotes the occupation of Palestinian land to settle with Jews.
And so ... what? We all sit around and scratch our chins and say "Oh, how terrible". Or do we deny that Israel has a right to exist? Or what?
This is a state with a right of return only for Jews ...
It was set up as a Jewish state.
... that is occupying over 3 million people it is willing to starve because they are not Jews...
Multiple problems here. First, the people in Israel are not a monolithic entity. Second, while it is conceivable that some elements wish Palestinians to starve, many others have no such wish. Third, some would argue that this has nothing to do with Jews vs. Muslims or whatever, but more to do with terrorism and the like.
Representatives are elected by the people.
True. I often think that the Israeli people get the leaders they deserve. I also think that is unfortunate.
If you don't think that is fascism, you are pro-Israel.
Well, no. This kind of radicalisation is a major part of the problem. If any real progress is to be made, people have to start looking at things objectively, rather than taking sides. People must be willing to compromise, rather than call for the elimination of the "other" side. And so on. It's what being moderate means.
If you close a thread because you personally disagree with anyone having an opinion on the fascism of Israel, you are biased.
Correct. But that was not why the thread was closed.
Especially when the discussion was progressing clearly without anyone getting inflamed, except for you.
This is a double standard. In one breath you complain about how the "All Muslims lie" thread was allowed to continue until the flame wars got too heated, while in the next you advocate leaving your inflammatory thread open when you know it would have equally descended into flame wars.
At least try for some consistency in your arguments, SAM.