An Evening of Speculation.
- Thread starter Terry Giblin
- Start date
That might be worth going to just to heckle that arsehole Polkinghorne.
You're still asking the same crap after 4 years? What an excellent example of wasting time you are. You and Green Destiny should start a club together.
I am nothing like him.
"You don't ever enter into a discussion about the topics, which you don't understand."
You were not there. "True or false?"
Which came first, QM or GR?
In Dirac co-ordinates, please.
Light in, Light out.
You were not there. "True or false?"
Which came first, QM or GR?
In Dirac co-ordinates, please.
Light in, Light out.
If this is true,
The opposite must be true, also.
Light in, Light out.
The opposite must be true, also.
Light in, Light out.
Light in, Light out.
No, in Hamilton-Jacobi-Koebe-Caratheodory co-or-din-ates please. I want in these co-or-din-ates only.
Both have written lengthy 'essays' on topics they don't understand which are full of misspellings and botched mathematics. Both post threads on topics they believe they understand on some level but don't. Both make claims they can't or won't back up. Both appear to spend considerable time doing activities physics related but which only provide superficial learning, if any. Both delude themselves into thinking said activities are constructive and worthwhile.
The major difference between you and Terry is you are at least capable of holding a rational discussion and making coherent posts. How often you choose to do that is a different matter....
You must be mistaking me for someone else. I have never written an essay. If you read the posts I have made, nothing even constitutes close to an essay, apart from the top-down cosmology, and even that was really short.
.. and whether or not my work is contructive, is really in the eye of the beholder.
Semantics. You've written longer than average posts putting forth your views or ideas on some area of science and presented it as an attempt at serious work. Not in the sense of "This is publishable research" but "Look at me, I'm doing science!".
Unfortunately for you there's this thing call reality and if no matter how many people 'behold' your work to be constructive if it disagrees with reality then its wrong. Then there's logic and mathematics, if you can't construct sound logic or do the mathematics properly then the work is wrong. There's no "You say potato, I say pot-ah-to" when it comes to making mistakes like "I divide by two" and then you take the square root instead.
Your lengthy post on entanglement didn't even mention anything to do with entanglement! Few people will think work on a subject is constructive if it makes no mention of the subject!
You point the finger so much, No one here is going to think of me any less.
You sir, have accused me of lying, which you can substantiate with any proof - lying about subjects you cannot prove. Now you are accusing me of something you yet again cannot prove, hence, there is no evidence.
Shame on you.
And by the way, lengthy threads are different from lengthy posts, you ignorant, thick, son of a bitch.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
You appear to be wrong on this point. I have learned, through careful consideration of multiple posts in many threads, that Alphanumeric is knowledgeable in general within the field of physics, has specialist knowledge in certain areas and - this is especially valuable - declares his limits when appropriate.
For these reasons I accord considerable weight to his opinion. When he offers criticism of the ideas of someone such as yourself I sit up, take notice and - as in this instance - provisionally think less of you, or at least of your ideas.
When you resort to posts such as "And by the way, lengthy threads are different from lengthy posts, you ignorant, thick, son of a bitch." then I find my view of you is no longer provisional.
If your objective is to sway others to give your hypothesis serious consideration then you might want to recognise that your present approach won't work.
oh shut up. It's obvious you know nothing of what has truly been passed between me or HIM, but if you did, you still would have to be ignorant to make some of the assinine comments.
You aren't perhaps the same person? If not, I apologize, but you can still go sling yer hook.
For ''clarification''
to me, posts are individual things: Threads constitute the entire message, and hence can be used for multiple posts.
to me, posts are individual things: Threads constitute the entire message, and hence can be used for multiple posts.
But I do agree with one thing. It is never nice seeing someone resort to name-calling.
If you were sticking up for someone who refrained from that themselves, I would probably agree with your contentions, but, I think in this case, you are being baised, if indeed you don't understand the exchanges we have had.
If you were sticking up for someone who refrained from that themselves, I would probably agree with your contentions, but, I think in this case, you are being baised, if indeed you don't understand the exchanges we have had.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
I don't require to know what has passed between the two of you. I simply have to know that Alphanumeric is knowledgeable, a good judge ofthe physics expertise of other poster and displays nothing of the angst and anger and emotion that characterises many of your posts.
You will be doing a remarkable job if you can demonstrate that any of the comments in my post are assinine, but have a go at it if you wish.
I am not Alphanumeric. I will not be accepting your kind offer to 'sling my hook'. This is a public forum. I have offered you some good advice. If you are too stubborn or stupid to take it that is not a problem for me, only for you.
No... that just extremely dogmatic. And opinionated. That's all which he wins over me right here, right now.
Oh, god, were does one start? How about, the part you are making out that my statement about him being an over-rated fool for starters> He had provided no evidence to any of his wild unsubstantiated claims, yet you are quick to stand his corner. You know nothing of the situation, i've explained this to you, yet you persist again.
You offered me good advice?
No you didn't, you've offered me nothing. Apart from a useless arguement.