Ban Proud Muslim?

does not matter anymore, it seem PM is already banned, lets lynch somebody else now, how about otheadp

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

He's only on a three day ban. And why otheadp?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don´t know, I haven´t read anything from otheadp.
And as far as I know, PM is still only temorarily banned.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes Spurious, wouldn't that be tragic if I was in charge. Then maybe people like you would be forced to take charge and stand up for what they believe every now and then when they are challenged, not be pathetic followers their whole existance.

 

I take that back.

Were you capable of more than a two line post, you might be worth challenging.

 

arditezza, im only looking at this page, but you have made a
1 liner
then a 2liner
then a 2 liner

you can hardly hack on anyone for having too short posts

 

why otheadp, simple, for the same reasons as PM

 

boredom you mean???

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Show me some threads in which he posts. I nearly never enter the religion forum.

 

If you looked at my history, most of my posts are far longer than that. I pointed out spurious because most of the time his responses are more of a, "Me too" or "you tell em" variety that shows very little thought and very little ambition. I find followers boring, and mostly without merit since they aren't really thinking for themselves. I'd rather have one PM bringing up things that people don't like to think about, or challenges their ideals, then ten followers. I would go so far as saying that followers are useless posters that add nothing to a forum at all, and should all be banned for not having a thought for themselves. But that kind of elitism is usually frowned upon. Pity that.

 

talking about me?

 

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=36169
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=36169&page=4


ill quote a bit from him,
"Athiests are like cars without fuel ( humans without religion ) to supply them with morales and guidance, since religion is the source of morales, athiests are void of any morales."

if you want to see his worst stuff tho, you have to get to it before it gets edited by the mods, id look round the religion section if i were u

 

The point was PM should not be banned just because some people cannot tolerate a different viewpoint.

Its not that hard to skip post by posters you dont like, but if it becomes to much of a challenge there is a ignore function, its free to use.
In the end banning people is not the solution.

 

hey kunax, stop spoiling our fun, atm we can pretend we can acutally achieve something here

who wants a 'ban kunax' thread???

JK

 

The threads in the religion forum are really drastically cut if you put PM on your ignorelist.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

yea i vote yes in a "ban Kunax" thread anyday.

never read the religion forums, they are not as funny as i had hoped

 

I'm a follower?

Do you have any evidence to suggest that this statement might be based on the 'truth'?

 

Yes, I clicked on your username and did a "Find all posts...". If you can't see the evidence there, then you are much worse off than I originally thought. The lack of content alone is something to be ashamed of, but going further your can see your "me too" and "I agree" posts pretty plainly. 10+ posts a day over two years, most of which (at least since my time here) haven't been very thought provoking. Are you denying that? Most of your posts seem to be in support or against a particular poster, and not even the ideas and opinions of that poster. Your profile is correct though, you are indeed being too negative.