Bases on Mars? What's the holdup?

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by HGVonGalten, Apr 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nasor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,231
    Actually it's about mach 37, which is 11.2 km/second. The problem with this idea is that it would place huge G forces on whatever you were launching. If your catapult was 1 km long, anything being accelerated to escape velocity on it would be subject to about 6400 G. If it was 100 km long, it would still be around 64 G - far too high for a person, and probably too much for most materials. And that's assuming you could even build a launcher that was 100 km long.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2008
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    Atmospheric pressure is 6-10mbar (earth's is ~1000mbar). Solar wind striping is believe to be one possible factor in the loss of Mars's atmosphere, another one is that mars with is low gravity had most of it's atmosphere blown off in asteroid collisions, and I would put my bets on the later being the bigger factor.

    Mars's atmospheric pressure is at the triple point for water so water can exist as a liquid but just barely within a very small temperature window, still it will evaporate/subliminate really fast as ice or gas is the more stable states for water on Mars.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. weed_eater_guy It ain't broke, don't fix it! Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,516
    Really, I never knew that, interesting...

    I had a small brainstorm a while back about how to do a mars mission at a discount by simply not putting a lander capable of takeoff on the surface. A mission that would be a precursor to a true mars mission would be an interplanetary manned trip in a ship that has a lander loaded up with base construction materials and remote controlled drones and robots. Some may have some autonomy, but some could be made humanoid and controlled by the astronauts in the ship as it orbits mars. It would be something like a VR setup, with VR headsets, sensors to detect arm and leg movement, etc. The mission would be to have the drones build a working base and have it mothballed and ready to go in time for a future mission. Also, it would be the first manned interplanetary mission, which would give engineers and scientists a wealth of information on how to improve future interplanetary manned spaceflight systems.

    It just seems like a huge undertaking to do a mars mission because to prepare for the mission, not only do we need to perfect manned spaceflight, but we'd need to have a lander, then we'd need to have whatever gizmos we need to make fuel, then hope to god the lander makes it with that fuel, etc. etc., it just sounds like an engineering nightmare to attempt all that in a single trip, compared to just making a mission intended purely to improve manned spaceflight and to prepare for a future mars mission. Kind of a baby step if you will.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    YES WE ARE

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Why do we have to do it on Mars ?
     
  9. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    you missed the point here, we need new physics discoveries to get to places like Mars.
     
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    To make it easier and more comfortable, or to get there at all ?
    I really think the technology to get to mars and set up a colony is already here, and has been for some decades.
     
  11. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    no...unfortunately there is not. We need a different sort of lander on Mars to be able to land very heavy and volume full objects like rockets on there.
     
  12. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Yea but that's doable with current technology.
     
  13. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    Once we have a colony on Mars, they would want to be independent and their own government, then they would throw all the teacargo into the valley...
     
  14. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Then we can finally have a planetary war

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    thats what I am saying...its not doible right now...the only alternate option is to have it land using propulsion element on most of the trajectory. All the reason why this is so hard to land on Mars is because of 1/100 of Earth air density there...there is just not enough drag to slow down the vehicle.
     
  16. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    But we don't have to invent new technologies to come up with a solution for it.
     
  17. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    but you see the problem here is different...it is just going to be soo expensive (even on space business scale money) that it is not practical. Its like trying to move a mountain with woodsticks. I hope you got the analogy.
     
  18. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    The currently proposed technology for Mars are overly expensive and are not feasible. The rovers sent to Mars get away with parachutes + some propulsion element at low altitudes + expandable ball technique maneuver...well the rovers get away with it because they are not as heavy and volumetric as what is needed to be landed on Mars. When we need something 4 times as much as Spirit rover landing there...the usual approaching of it hard landing and bounching on the expandable balloons is not practical...because there are humans in there if they will experience such jerk (change in acceleration) movements they will most likely die. And another solution is to land using propulsion element all the way...but can you just imagine what that means? It means that vehicle that is to land on Mars needs to have most of its weight being fuel which will be used to power the propulsion descent. And...added to that...we just dont have that much experience with landing using propulsion.
     
  19. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    That's what I said, it's mostly the money that's holding them back.
     
  20. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    but you got to realize how much money...we are not talking Apollo-like type of hype money...nope...many times more than Apollo needed at its own time money.
     
  21. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    Apollo: 135$ billion dollars (in our time 2005...converted from 25 billion dollars in 1960's)
     
  22. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
  23. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I do realize

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    That's why I said it's mostly money that's holding them back, not technology.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page