blackk hole information paradox

[Ethernos D Grace]

i think i may have solve the blackhole information paradox.
journey contd....
ANSWER: particle return to the field and energy of space increases.
and also since the energy is also increasing from second law of thermodynamics energy is flowing in from outside the observable universe.
even if this is not true. information paradox might be solved.

 

[James R]

i think i may have solve the blackhole information paradox.

I assume you've read Hawking's recent papers on the matter. What do you think of his solution?

ANSWER: particle return to the field and energy of space increases.

Please explain in more detail. Do you intend to publish a paper on your solution.

...and also since the energy is also increasing from second law of thermodynamics energy is flowing in from outside the observable universe.

How does that follow?

even if this is not true. information paradox might be solved.

Or it might not, I guess (?)

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

i can't seem to follow hawkings work. combination of classical and quatum which seems incomplete.
no i don't intent to publish since i have no capability.

 

[exchemist]

i can't seem to follow hawkings work. combination of classical and quatum which seems incomplete.
no i don't intent to publish since i have no capability.

A flash of self-awareness there.

 

[DaveC426913]

I think the primary question here is: do you fully understand what the information paradox is? It may not be as simple as you think. Maybe it would help to synopsize your understanding of it here, so we can be sure we're all talking about the same thing.

 

[arfa brane]

I think the primary question here is: do you fully understand what the information paradox is? It may not be as simple as you think.

Especially since, the ordinary understanding of information isn't quite the same thing as the information in the black hole paradox.
A prerequisite for the black hole information paradox is understanding what the information is; information is kind of arbitrarily defined and is context dependent, or it is in information theory; the physical information in the paradox isn't classical for starters.

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

I think the primary question here is: do you fully understand what the information paradox is? It may not be as simple as you think. Maybe it would help to synopsize your understanding of it here, so we can be sure we're all talking about the same thing.

What if the whole particle returns to field as wave n tunnels out back at event horizon as quantum tunneling? Since i showed what quantum tunnelling n what wave n particle is.
Wave is a moving particle n particle is standing wave....

 

[DaveC426913]

What if the whole particle returns to field as wave n tunnels out back at event horizon as quantum tunneling?

I acknowledge that English is likely not your first language, but you can mitigate that by explaining your idea using more than a single sentence.


Although, based on your posting history so far, I suspect productive discussion is not really your goal here.

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

I acknowledge that English is likely not your first language, but you can mitigate that by explaining your idea using more than a single sentence.

I edited my ans i am good with quantum mechanics.

 

[DaveC426913]

i am good with quantum mechanics.

No. No you are not.

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

A question newton or einstein couldn't ask is why particle move in wave pattern because there is bump in space...gauge theory.if u can work out this. U can work out gravity.

 

[James R]

A question newton or einstein couldn't ask is why particle move in wave pattern because there is bump in space...gauge theory.if u can work out this. U can work out gravity.

I think you're talking nonsense.

Particles don't typically "move in wave pattern". What do you mean?

What is a "bump in space"?

What do you think a gauge theory is, exactly?

We already have some good theories of gravity, btw.

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

Sorry sir.

 

[river]

Ethernos D Grace said: ↑

A question newton or einstein couldn't ask is why particle move in wave pattern

Because the particle is within the wave . The particle is the wave . Density of the particle . The particle does not , is not the essence of any wave .

The wave is energy . What creates the energy that creates the wave . That is the question .

The deeper question . Both exist . And in no particular order of existence .