Can we define god?

What exactly does that mean? I'm not a math-head.

As for my ditty, well it might describe reality, but for God to be meaningful he has to be integral to reality, no? God is probably much more than that, but it's only a little ditty - not a theological treatsie.
 
ULTRA said:
What exactly does that mean?
Click to expand...
It means exactly as much as the rest of Chaos's posts: sod all.
It's devoid of content, devoid of meaning and what terms it does have don't actually relate to anything.

He's just proved himself to be a complete and utter waste of time.
From now I think I'll stop actually responding to his posts and just dip in now and again to correct his inanities.
 
Emil said:

Thanks,
please prove and eventually to give examples.
Click to expand...

There are all different parts of the bible pertaining to the character of God such as Ezekiel 1-12, Daniel ch4 v3 and so-on. However, this is not sunday-school and I am no preacher..
 
God is a cold beer on a hot day...How's that for profound eh?...lol

No, I have no source, or links...Take it at face value..:cool:
 
Well, I've run out of alcohol (again) so i guess it's time for some kip. Darn..if only the tap would start running with wine..
 
ULTRA said:
There are all different parts of the bible pertaining to the character of God such as Ezekiel 1-12, Daniel ch4 v3 and so-on. However, this is not sunday-school and I am no preacher..
Click to expand...


Then what are we talking about?
The title of this thread is "Can we define god?"
I clearly said "I can not define God".
What you said I do not think but maybe I'm wrong and you can prove what you said.
If you can not prove means that you believe in God but you can not define and prove.
You can only afirimi what to think about God.
 
God only asks us to have faith, thats all. Even a life-long science geek like me can do that. Proof will always be elusive because how can we describe something unknowable?
 
ULTRA said:
God only asks us to have faith, thats all. Even a life-long science geek like me can do that. Proof will always be elusive because how can we describe something unknowable?
Click to expand...

Yes,
in my opinion is a good response from you and I can not argue against it.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Bullshit.
Pure, unsupported bullshit.

Oh wait! Now you're telling us you are (and everyone else is) a meaningless equation....
Click to expand...

So your saying God is not undefined, The least understood?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-time_Markov_process#Embedded_Markov_chain

That goes against all present evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula

You "Barely" understand the markov chain and that is possibly an understatement. You have no idea the basis of Density, except your think head. Can you not count? What post number was this?post :D

I want to play a Game. And it is a game for all times:D, in reality. My bet is while "SOMEBODY"S brain is stuck on God the rest of the would will have accomplished something. Or is that writting too "boring" for you? Let's hear your thoughts on the "Philosophical" concept of recurrence from your perspective.
 
Emil said:

You can only afirimi what to think about God.
Click to expand...

Yes, so what do you think about me?

"How to have all men against you- If anyone dared to say now, "whoever is not with me, is against me," he would immediately have all men against him.- This does our time Honor"-Neitzsche

"positive and negative.- This thinker needs nobody to refute him: for that he suffices himself"-Neitzsche

Are you with me or against me? Choice.
 
Dywyddyr said:
It means exactly as much as the rest of Chaos's posts: sod all.
It's devoid of content, devoid of meaning and what terms it does have don't actually relate to anything.

He's just proved himself to be a complete and utter waste of time.
From now I think I'll stop actually responding to his posts and just dip in now and again to correct his inanities.
Click to expand...

Woo Hoo. Win for free will.:)
 
chaos1956 said:
So your saying God is not undefined
Click to expand...
No one's defined god so far.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-time_Markov_process#Embedded_Markov_chain
That goes against all present evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koide_formula
Click to expand...
Copy-pasting equations that have nothing to do with the topic don't help.

You "Barely" understand the markov chain
Click to expand...
Wrong again.

Can you not count? What post number was this?post :D
Click to expand...
So what? That's not a post I referred to.

I want to play a Game. And it is a game for all times:D, in reality. My bet is while "SOMEBODY"S brain is stuck on God
Click to expand...
Why start the thread if you're not going to stick to the subject?

Let's hear your thoughts on the "Philosophical" concept of recurrence from your perspective.
Click to expand...
Recurrence? As in a banned member posting under a different name in an effort to avoid the ban?
You were incomprehensibly stupid as M00se and you're still as bad.
Goodbye.
 
chaos1956 said:
Yes, so what do you think about me?

"How to have all men against you- If anyone dared to say now, "whoever is not with me, is against me," he would immediately have all men against him.- This does our time Honor"-Neitzsche

"positive and negative.- This thinker needs nobody to refute him: for that he suffices himself"-Neitzsche

Are you with me or against me? Choice.
Click to expand...

I think we are two opposite poles of the same magnet.
So we attract or oppose?

 
Moderator note: chaos1956 has been permanently banned as a sock puppet of another user attempting to evade a temporary ban.

Further use of sock puppets will result in a permanent ban of all accounts.
 
I do accept that the universe and it's behaviors reminds one of Intelligence.

But can anyone give me a reason why God cannot be intelligent without being motivationally conscious?

Is consciousness a necessary quality of intelligence? Or is intelligence a necessary quality of consciousness?

Can either exist independent of the other? Can one evolve from the other?
 
Last edited:
Was it pure motivated consciousness or pure inherent intelligence that caused the first small pattern to emerge from pure chaos?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top