Marquis:
With regard to mass, I'm not sure yet if you're seeing it in terms of gravitational force.
Nope, but I invite you yet to my lunacy, an asylum where the mind is forked with chocolate rivers in which the both of us drown nasty children….
Additional: Cognitive dissonance, Gendanken. There it is. Staring at the fucking easel wondering what I'm going to paint. Misgivings about my ability to do so. Becoming lost in conflicting thoughts and the ramifications of them. Assume a stance, I said. Would that I could take my own advice.
Guy le Liberte, founder of Cirque, called it the ‘white paper’.
It's a demon tyrannizing you with its stare. You can’t justify your fleeing and discomfort as it even cheats you of the solace that it’s bigoted.
Thing about Guy, though, is he doesn’t have to pay rent and doesn’t have to defer to people like Bo (who I plan to dedicate an entire thread to soon…..).
Fetus:
Yeah because not like Bill Gates has not given $28 billions to charity. Heck its not like one can find a list of rich philanthropists.
Bill Gates, like every celebrity on the hunt for a child, is in a rush to give his money away before the government seizes it.
They’re not loving people, as the term “philanthropy” literally translates to. They’re skirting the Death Tax.
The rich can only sign a portion of their wealth over tax free—the rest is subject to federal law up to 50%.
Read it again, gimlet: if I willed a million dollars to you, money that has already been federally taxed and portioned in all those years I’ve earned it, then
half of that goes back to the government via a Death Tax.
This is why people like Madonna crave poor kids from slums—they need something dumb enough to not question their authority and poor enough to not squander it on Gucci.
And because they can only will over certain amounts before it gets taxed, they need to amass enough heirs to undermine your government’s claim to their wealth. Notice the size of Angelina Jolie’s growing army, notice the desperate heavings of even celebrity lesbians to have children….
Well lets say I invent a cure to cancer, people want my cure, and I want to be rich, so I charge incredibly for my cure, sure they are cured of cancer, but are now destitute, I'm rich. Likewise the free market has more limits then that. Let say I want more profit, so I fire all my workers and replace them with robots, as a result I'm able to produce more products of better quality for cheaper, I and the customer win, but my former employees don't, but any services to provide for them in antithesis to the free-market as I will have to pay for it. I have five apples and want to sell them for $10 dollars, I have a costumer that wants them for only $5, I convince them the apples are magical and he buys them for $15, customer does not always know best, but the free-market is reliant on the customer knowing best. I can go on and on. Now don't get me wrong the free-market is great for many things, but it is certainly not a cure-all, there is no ideological solution that solves everything, sometimes you need regulation, sometimes you need even a little socialism, and sometimes you need to be altruistic.
Pharmaceutical companies
are as idiotic as you are.
The only thing allowing their wasteful stupidity is that ultimately WE foot the bill.
For example, Scorpion antivenom:
Metro Phoenix hospitals are billing as much as $12,467 per vial of the antivenom approved to help children, the elderly and others quickly recover from severe reactions from scorpion stings.
With a typical dose of three to five vials to counteract the venomous sting, hospital bills for patients and their insurance companies can exceed $62,000.
Source
Price in Mexico, where it’s manufactured? 100 dollars per vial.
All the suppliers, distributors, insurance companies, lobbyists, third, fourth and fifth parties involved in hiking the price up in this country before it hits the market
know big government will ultimately pay the hospital bill.
Pfizer, like JP Morgan and Shaniqua, is a welfare queen.
That’s IRRATIONAL and NOT capitalism. America, as you know it now, is decomposing into fascism.
That’s what Rand is saying.
Wynn:
Which is why you're such a daisy toward me, eh.
Ah, women!
Oh god, ladies, we’re going to start co-menstruating soon if you don’t quit.
That explains why she eventually began to doubt whether God exists or not.
Well, Mother Theresa only “doubted” God’s existence the way you idly wonder if you flushed the office toilet.
A slight disturbance skimmed her surface, nothing more. Someone like her—an Albanian peasant, a rustic knotted into a contradictory impulse to both serve and control—is completely incapable of even conceiving a premise long enough to measure it.
“Pity is a the most agreeable feeling among those who have little pride and no prospects of great conquests; for them easy prey is
enchanting”- Fred
You can therefore not point to her fame and influence as stature—like Fudd, all she did was hunt rabbit.
So as for self doubt, Dostoevsky experienced that torture; Turgenev and Twain, same.
She’s like my mother--an idiot’s bastardization of Heisenberg’s principle: the more precisely the position of her tiny mind on anything can be known, the less precisely the momentum of her brain can be determined.
I’m sure we all remember the gasp heard during her Nobel Prize acceptance as , apropos of nothing, the woman started rattling about abortion.
A bead of mercury, and just as toxic.
As an aside - Bertolt Brecht, so big on the rights of workers and all that - wore shirts tailored the same way as those of workers -- except that his were made of silk.
Never heard of him.
But I can see him beautifully dressed up there with Jim Jones and Mike Murdock cannibalizing stupid people.
I hear Christian blood makes fine thread.
She’s also quite intelligent.
Trooper:
Hmm…will to nothingness? Are you sure about that?
Not nothingness- beyond. Nothingness is for pretentious nihilists (ahem, cue the Marquis)
Nietzsche envied sheep, or some other ruminant. Did you know that?
What portion of nothing does a lamb pretend?
Why does he use an old woman to express them?
Because speaking to girls is like eating hair?
Do, however, remember who we’re talking about— a bumbling savant with a hard on.
Nietzsche was
rejected and, for little boys who know nothing of women yet desperately seek to hump one, an old woman is refuge.
In fact, I would argue he experienced the only true feminist capable of toppling the pillars of patriarchy: tomboys.
Mister Ubermenche was dumped by a tomboy……..*cackle*
What about women, gendanken? What were his views on women?
Not sure where you’re going with this, but certainly you’re not intimating Nietzsche thought well of women? OR that his misogyny was a product of his sister’s editing?
Not only does he rightly see women as cows but, if memory serves, refers to both his insufferable sisters and mother as ‘canaille’.
Mwahaha....…
And the whip, have you floundered through the whip?
No, but I’ve goldfished through some spankings…...
His sister wrote: "How did it come about that my brother is generally considered a misogynist?"
Aaaaaanndd….checkmate.
That’s what I’m talking about—is it any wonder Munchausen By Proxy is a disease found in women?
Only a woman can squat her 300 pound body on a sleeping child, watch it slowly suffocate as she’s biting off its fingers, and wonder that its dying.
Then fight tooth and nail on trial that she’s a loving mother. An image capturing such perfect femininity:
How can Elizabeth say that??? He detested her as she is
detestable. There’s a passage in the Gay Science about despising a disciple that that I believe was about her.
Don’t’ make me look for it, my ass is numb.
She actually wrote that? Actually wondered? Moron.
