In your personal opinion, do you feel that the following implication is valid or invalid? "I'm Not God I am God" I am God. If I am immortal, then I will die sometime in the future Thank you to vote before posting any comment.
That would seem to be valid (but trivial) if we accept the principle of explosion, ex falso quodlibet. (From falsehood anything follows.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion That looks like a conditional, not an argument. So validity wouldn't seem to apply. The conditional 'If p then q' would be T under the interpretation of p as F and q as T. Truth functional logic can be counterintuitive. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Is this ""I'm Not God I am God" I am God." statement valid concerning you. Yes or No will do. EDIT: I suppose we have to define God. So go with one you know most about.
This thread is closed and cesspooled. The opening post is meaningless nonsense - a waste of everybody's time. Moreover, it has nothing to do with Philosophy (where it was originally posted).