...DID we go to the moon?

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by GeoffP, May 14, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    533
    Well, your credibility is shot.


    It's pretty clear that he's wrong about the flag.
    https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showth...pollo-footage-was-filmed-in-air-here-on-earth

    It starts moving before the astronaut gets close enough to touch it.

    Anyway, Betamax agrees with Jay Windley on the dust-free sand issue so he has no credibility either.

    Any seventh-grader could tell you that it wouldn't cause enough friction to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over. It would take a gang of men hitting the sand with sledgehammers for several days straight to create that much dust. Your credibility is shot.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,864
    I don't believe you.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,716
    Believe FratFeddy!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,509
    I take it you have never driven on a gravel road before! Try it. Try it after a rain - then a week after that rain. See if there's more dust, less dust or the same amount of dust after a week of being dry.

    You had no credibility to begin with, so I won't claim it's shot. But getting some real world experience might help you start building some up.
     
  8. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    275
    You poor spammer. I suppose somewhere in that addled brain of yours lies a phrase, action or claim that you haven't made a hundred times before. You are so painfully predictable it is like watching an ant trying to escape a gigantic boot treading on it!

    You have no credibility whatsoever. For some crazy reason you think your opinion on this matter gives you carte blanch to assess other people agreeing with somebody who absolutely owns you.

    Clear to you? The most ridiculous person on the internet?

    Way before the ignorant claim that air moves it. Not only does he highlight that fact, but shows why it is significant in debunking your mega-spammed madness about the Apollo 15 flag.

    You have no concept of why that argument is so circular it comes round and bites you in the butt. Everyone agrees with Windley, everyone who knows what they are talking about.

    You are a ridiculous joke. As if you have any idea about this straw man argument! I have a little picture as my avatar. It shows a boot print being made, during footage that has clear fine dust being kicked about. You are cornered, check mated and acting like the Black knight. The debate hall wouldn't let in somebody as ignorant as you. You will never debate honestly - no amount of evidence or expert testimony can get past Dunning and Kruger.
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    Just find the equipment left behind by the Apollo . What's the problem of doing so ?

    Is this not easy to do ?

    It should be .
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2019
  10. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,224
    "easy" is the explanation of the lie
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    Why ?
     
  12. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,224
    because it is counter intellectualism
     
  13. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    Ahh....I see so intellectualism is more important than finding actual physical evidence ?

    If so , that is an attitude , mindset , that needs to change .
     
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,360
    There's no problem in finding it. We know exactly where it is. The problem is that moon conspiracist nuts will never accept any evidence of the moon landings, no matter what you put in front of them. It's a religion to these guys. Any physical evidence that is put in front of them is always immediately dismissed by them as a fake - part of the Grand Conspiracy.

    Believing the moon landings never happened is no different from believing in fairies at the bottom of the garden, or pyramid power, or that the moon is made of cheese.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    12,760
    Agreed James .

    But where are the pictures , photos of the equipment ? Left behind .
     
  16. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,360
  17. river

    Messages:
    12,760
  18. dumbest man on earth Real Eyes Realize Real Lies Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,041
    If you honestly believe all of that to be True, then why waste the effort to put any physical evidence in front of them?

    If physical evidence will never get them to accept the moon landings, do you suppose calling them names will?

    Why even waste the effort to engage them, or let alone talk about them, at all?

    (edited just now to add) Nice pictures you Posted while I was typing!!
     
  19. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,360
  20. dumbest man on earth Real Eyes Realize Real Lies Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,041
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2019
  21. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,224
    link to the official nasa footage
    sitting on the nasa server

    getting everyone half drunk and sitting in the dark while you get someone to poke the curtains and then replaying the video over and over as a logical sound scientific reason why logical sound reasonable science is not real...
     
  22. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,360
    dmoe:

    I don't actually spend much of my time doing that, as you will see if you follow my postings on the topic.

    I mean, it's clear that Fat Freddy is either a troll or so desperately deluded that he's beyond help, so engaging with him in a serious way is bound to be a waste of time. He's good for a laugh now and then, but that's about it.

    It's no different than talking to a Flat Earth campaigner, or similar.

    Calling them names? You mean when I referred to them as conspiracy nuts? No, I don't think that will change their minds. The campaigners like Fat Freddy are already well aware they are conspiracy nuts, and it hasn't made any impact on them.

    Because other people read these threads. They might learn something. You know, honest enquirers after truth and all that. There are some of them out there.
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    12,760
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page