Do we have free will or is everything predestined?

Well said Gustav! I dont have time to go into the issue now.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

ok this is what i worked out

critica mass
if one point has an energy thru a signal from one point
and if another point and many more have this signal
one can use the signal for device in weather change
am i right or ami wrong

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

with critical mass
it can bring the world on its knees
then we dont have free will

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

ok look what if the signal is the one thing we see in a calculated greene gass
if one has the less greene house gass it seems to be the most giving in greene house right
then what if that is energy passed thru a signal

 

hold an ice cube in ur hand
it will melt

now nothing has changed in the atmosphere but only heat

 

how can the atmosphere have anything to do with climate change
u cant test the atmosphere u wont find anything wrong with it

so maybe its the energy coming from a signal causing heat
and many signals together is critical mass

 

sooo i sent a signal
a few years back it never came back
till i sent another one this time it came back
i sent this signal from my pc just a normal pc not this one
i programed my old pc like i always did
cause i dont like docs
those signals never cam back
only last time it came back
seems to me they have advanced technology and have blocked
they also tracked the signal only to the area
no one can see their files
so why are they so dammed worried about a signal
no one can hack their files as im not a hacker
but i doubt very much if anyone can hack into gvtment files to do with child safety
yet the signal came back
they blocked it
ok look the usa said they saw on video or film of australia having very intelligent
equipment and it blastered this unidentified object the usa was tracking
now the point it came from was in australia
now the signal i sent to roma qld seems to be blocked
where would they know the way to do that
i mean ok so i know but i only know so how did they kow to use equipment
maybe the signal is coming friom them in roma qld
go ahead send one urselves
it will only come back
i reckon its a critical mass to bring the world on its knees
i may be jumping the gun abit but best to be safe than sorry
strange how the weather changed dramaticly and the same areas are hit precisely the same time years later to date is it timed aswell

 

ok why would liberals give the dept an abundance of money and also they have no law
no law can touch them
now why would they buy extravagant technology
when they are only keeping files
ok look i proved to my govtment they overspent in elaborate inteligent equipment
but why
and why is the signal coning from australia
and why was my signal blocked
hmm
i for one know they are into more than one would think

 

ok i warned you of them buying advanced equipment did i not
ok i found this old movie it explains detail for detail
critical mass and the energy sent thru signals
its called The Arrival
its about climate change and of course its alien stuff too
Enjoy

 

ahmm do you think i had too much coffee today

 

it was bloody french coffee fuck me bloody rome
parden my french

 

i am the real bloody rome
kmguru is an imposter and an alien to boot
you bastard, km!
we are on to you

 

We are not alone.
We aren't even just one person, but we end up "collecting" every one else's "person"--this is who we are.

No-one is any more than all the reflections of everyone else they've ever met. Also all the things they've seen (awake and asleep), or heard, or felt, or tasted. Everything "you" have ever experienced: eaten, breathed, or added to "yourself", is what you are. Information collecting itself.

 

I do not know unless Chalmer, who coined the phrase*, is a professor there.

BTW Chalmer also suggested that it is impossible to explain the "crumbling hand" experimental results by any known version of consciousness, but it falls out easily (is even predicted by) my "real-time-simulation" model of perception.
---------------------
*"Consciousness is the hard problem."

 

For answer see:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1689440&postcount=39

and the several preceeding posts by me and metakron.

It is possible (probably not too likely, I think and hope) that the Earth is already starting to switch to the hot stable state. Venus switched to it long ago.

If the Earth's atmosphere becomes opaque to surface IR radiation, then the switch will occur and Earth will become steril (No life of any form on Earth, as then the atmosphere will be nearly 100% H2O as very hot steam at the surface.)

 

The climate is changing because there is more heat in the atmosphere.
This is because humans have altered the heat capacity (its ability to hold heat) of the atmosphere by adding CO2 and NOX and so on, apart from all the other pollution (nitrates, metals), that are causing changes in the oceans and elsewhere.

This is largely due to our collective inability to think further than a few years ahead.

 

True, but a tauntology.

Nonsense - O2 and N2 (plus a little argon) are so dominate that replacing all other gases with a mix of these three could make exactly zero change in the heat capacity (if the mix is chosen correctly). I am nearly sure as I understand heat capacity physics that Arogn has lower heat capacity than either of the dominate two so suitable mix is a little A with which ever has the higher heat capacity, but O2 and N2 will be nearly the same as both are diatomic molecules. I bet O2 is very slightly higher than N2 in heat capacity, but possibly not in all temperatre ranges (if their rotational and vibrational spectra differ significantly).

 

You don't seem to understand what a greenhouse gas is. O2 , Ar and N2 have nothing like the capacity to "store" heat that CO2 or NOx, or methane, or ozone, or any of the other anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants have. You do know what "absorb" means, in terms of radiation?

 

ja, prof in hameroffs dept
consciousness has two explanatory components. a soft and a hard. in light of your claim i shall read your thesis again. perhaps a greater understanding of pov could be extracted

billyt, indulge with this prediction. keep the exposition as simple as possible
thanks