Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Write4U, Aug 7, 2020.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Yes and lesser energenic objects .
Which is physical .
Pure energy would have a smaller field expansion than would a Galaxy . Because it is confined because pure energy has speed , which confines its expansion . Absolute zero is where this happens .
Absolute zero temperature , also confines expansion of any field .
Distilled essence of nonsense. Inimitable.
I love it. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Prove its non-sense . Care to Discuss with me ?
exchemist always runs away . I wonder why ? Anyway that's his choice .
|What would be the point? You are an idiot.
Prove it . Prove that I'm actually an idiot . Your a coward . ( and Your the worst of the worst ) . The troll kind , that can not handle discussion . Tell me different exchem.
Oh and so far exchem. your the only one here on this thread that thinks so .
The proof is all over this forum.
But the instance that first made me come to this conclusion is this thread:http://www.sciforums.com/threads/has-there-been-an-improved-understanding-of-water.135771/
As for others, why do think you are banned from posting in the hard science sections? It's because you are an idiot. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
There has been , just go on youtube.com , you will see all kinds of experiments done on water .
As for the last statement
Define " idiot " to you .
Further , is this why JamesR I have been banned from hard science sections ? If so , I have no problem with this . But I think its more about having people think about the same things without my input . I have no problem with this by the way people . I don't . They have many interesting topics that I wish I could reply . I just accept it and move on . And adjust as I have shown .
Any way exchemist when you have matured , only then will we have direct communication . For me your a simple scientist , I know what I have been taught , thats it . But the deeper you go into water , and what it is , its behaviour , it can burn with a flame , both hydrogen and oxygen are a liquid at extremely cold tempertures , -250C° , -275 celcius , . Yet together they produce a liquid at room tempuriture . I found that interesting .
To the OP , No .
That is not a counter argument to the argument that patterns emerging from chaos is a form of proof that the universe has mathematical properties.
mathematics of chaos theory - Wikipedia
Chaos Theory is a mathematical argument. Are you proposing it is a false argument?
But not the cause of the patterns in the first place .
Yes it is, because self-forming repeating patterns are abundant in nature.
Count the petals of daisies or the seeds in sunflowers and you will find the Fibonacci Sequence.
Patterns are formed by natural selection of greatest efficiency. A cell is spherical to facilitate even distribution of external pressure across its entire surface. An egg is oval to facilitate the laying process, and on and on we can show that nature prefers mathematical regularities in physical patterns.
That what chaos theory is based on, no?
Of course , hence physical reality . I don't get your point .
To your last statement , don't you know the chaos theory ? You should .
I do, but do you?
Note my statement was directed at you in the form of a question.
Right, physical reality is the expression of mathematical patterns into observable densities.
Good point .
Where then do mathematics come from then ? Life .
Mathematics is thought , not a real dimension .
Separate names with a comma.