Does space bend In a pure vacuum ?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by river, Dec 15, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Prove it , show it , that this , " mathematical singularity " , is more basic than the physical .

    With no refference to anything physical in its definition and proof .
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2020
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    The mathematical singularity are simply where our current laws of physics and GR are non applicable. And proof has never been the goal or meaning of science and scientific theories, but I'll bet my short n curlies, you'll ask the same question/s next week...and the week after that, and the week after that.
    The greater majority of your "statements of certainty" are always devoid of any scientific evidence, let alone this proof you constantly ask for, and predictably nothing but philosophical nonsense.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    34,678
    A mathematical singularity is not a "form of existence". It is just a point in a theoretical construct where the maths breaks down.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    To your last statement , no surprise .
     
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    While both I and James have answered you correctly river, I still doubt very much that you understand.
    The possibility of a physical singularity as distinct from the mathematical singularity, is still a reasonable concept. eg: GR tells us that once the mass of any object collapses beyond its Schwarzchild limit, further collapse is compulsory. In other words, it keeps on collapsing under gravity. By the same token, GR and our known laws fail us at the quantum/Planck level. So we know nothing at that epoch. At the same time, most all cosmologists do not accept collapse to infinite density and spacetime curvature, which effectively means that a "surface of sorts"should exist at or just below that quantum/Planck level.

    Now river you did say that now you have me on ignore, so you wont be reading this, but alternatively, you probably would not understand it anyway, and/or totally and ignorantly reject it, as it fails to align with your gobbledygook version of cosmology.
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    Well certainly this is your version of gobbledygook cosmology .
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    No river, It is the accepted mainstream version based on available evidence, with some reasonable speculation with regards to inside the BH's EH.
    But we have science threads on both the BB and BHs. If you have any science to offer, be my guest.
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Gobbledygook .
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    Tell me what you don't understand river?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    If you weren't so anti science, and immediatley falling for any anti science nonsense that you find in any little corner, you may understand that GR is our accepted theory of gravity, and is tested everyday and still passing those tests. A couple of threads I have started on that in the sciences river, go read them.
    Gravity of course is simply geometry, or curved/warped spacetime in the presence of mass/energy....why? we don't know.

    I would really like to drag you out of the cesspool you are grovelling river, and to show that, here is a short 7 minute video, that may help explain why in general, your one liner questions mean absolutely nothing.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    And you'll do what pad ?
     
  15. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    I'll try and show you the error of your ways, answer what I can, or give a reputable link, and remove the ignorant state of mind you are obviously in.
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    Which is it pad , geometry or.....
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    If that were even possible , then that would have happened many , many , many , posts ago .
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    Yes, I suppose you are right, sadly though, I don't believe you really know how badly that reflects on you.
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Not by the many.
     
  20. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    Are you sure?
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    14,698

    Not by the many.

    Of course .
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,023
    I truly doubt it river...but hey!! knock yourself out!!!!
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    14,698
    Anyway does Space Bend in a pure Vacuum .

    No .
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page