Fringe subforum

[Kittamaru]

Perhaps I have the same right to post here as any other valued member whether I agree with the science cheerleaders or not.

Certainly, you have the "right" to post whatever you wish. That does not exempt you from the consequences when you choose to violate the forum rules. You know, the very same rules you agreed to abide by when you registered.

I just suffer the inconvenience of not hiding my nonscientific beliefs under the label of "my religion" here.

So you admit your beliefs are nonscientific. Thank you.

So I get attacked and banned.

Much the same as jumping out of an aircraft without a parachute because you don't believe in gravity won't save you from a messy end, ignoring the rules here because you claim you disagree with them will not exempt you from their enforcement.

Thus, when you post something and claim it to be true, then choose to simply ignore evidence you don't like because it doesn't result in your desired conclusion, demand ever higher standards of evidence from others while providing little to none of your own, and generally act like a street corner preacher... well, it should come as no surprise when points are issued. After all, one wouldn't pass an officer doing 90 in a 25 and expect to be left alone.

The record speaks for itself.

Yes, your record does rather speak for itself.

 

[Magical Realist]

Certainly, you have the "right" to post whatever you wish. That does not exempt you from the consequences when you choose to violate the forum rules. You know, the very same rules you agreed to abide by when you registered.

This from the moderator who has infracted me so many times without justification that his actions have been overruled by James R and Bells.

So you admit your beliefs are nonscientific. Thank you.

Just like your beliefs Christian.

Much the same as jumping out of an aircraft without a parachute because you don't believe in gravity won't save you from a messy end, ignoring the rules here because you claim you disagree with them will not exempt you from their enforcement.

I have never violated any rules by simple posting evidence of the paranormal and ufos and you know it. It's always moderators making up new shit to get me banned. Every time.

Thus, when you post something and claim it to be true, then choose to simply ignore evidence you don't like because it doesn't result in your desired conclusion, demand ever higher standards of evidence from others while providing little to none of your own, and generally act like a street corner preacher... well, it should come as no surprise when points are issued. After all, one wouldn't pass an officer doing 90 in a 25 and expect to be left alone.

You're the ones who deny the photo, video and eyewitness evidence I post and preach your gospel of infallible science. By your own standards you should all be issued points.

Yes, your record does rather speak for itself.

As does your record of having bans and infractions reversed by James R and Bells.

 

[Kittamaru]

This from the moderator who has infracted me so many times without justification that his actions have been overruled by James R and Bells.

This from the member who continually defies the rules, even when advised by James R that continuing to do so would result in infractions.

Just like your beliefs Christian.

I never claimed my personal religious beliefs were scientific, nor did I try to force them on anyone else as truth.

I have never violated any rules by simple posting evidence of the paranormal and ufos and you know it. It's always moderators making up new shit to get me banned. Every time.

You're the ones who deny the photo, video and eyewitness evidence I post and preach your gospel of infallible science. By your own standards you should all be issued points.

I guess we should all be thankful that you aren't a moderator, then.

As does your record of having bans and infractions reversed by James R and Bells.

I guess time will tell

By the way - still waiting for you to support your shameful accusation against DaveC... or was that just more of your usual bluster?

 

[Magical Realist]

I never claimed my personal religious beliefs were scientific, nor did I try to force them on anyone else as truth.

Do I really need to quote your ridiculous arguments for Noah's ark and the worldwide flood? lol!

 

[Kittamaru]

Do I really need to quote your ridiculous arguments for Noah's ark and the worldwide flood? lol!

*shrug* I've no concerns about what I've said, though it is bemusing that you have made this thread entirely about you.

If you wish to introduce yet another entirely off topic rant, I'd recommend you create a thread for it in the appropriate subforum.

 

[DaveC426913]

How novel. Another thread, driven off the rails by Magical Realist's complaining about his treatment.

:unsub:

 

[Beer w/Straw]

Why wouldn't one simply join a forum that suits those needs?
If I am driving a Mini Cooper, and I want to haul boulders, do I tell Mini to graft a flatbed onto my Cooper (at great expense and risk), or do I just go get a pickup? They're free!

I frequent three different science fora, each with distinct focus and tolerance levels.

SciFo, BTW, is way waaaay waaaaaaaay the most tolerant of them. Seriously, it is the science forumy equivalent of being so open as to let its member's brains fall out.

Which does give it some uniqueness.

 

[Kittamaru]

How novel. Another thread, driven off the rails by Magical Realist's complaining about his treatment.

:unsub:

Seems that way.

 

[Kittamaru]

What say you Magical Realist :

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-great-flood-fact-or-fiction.159945/

 

[cluelusshusbund]

Seems that way.

Its a shame thar ant some sort of rule that woud help prevent people from runin threds off the rails

 

[Magical Realist]

How novel. Another thread, driven off the

Its a shame thar ant some sort of rule that woud help prevent people from runin threds off the rails

rails by Magical Realist's complaining about his treatment.

:unsub:

Always takes more than one to "run a thread off the rails."

 

[Kittamaru]

Always takes more than one to "run a thread off the rails."

"Always" is a dangerous word. There have been some members who were perfectly capable of derailing even their own threads themselves, when they were the only one posting to it.

 

[cluelusshusbund]

Always takes more than one to "run a thread off the rails."

From the example i just saw... when a thred is off the rails its administratons duty to keep it off the rails

 

[Bells]

Mod Note

This thread is no longer even remotely discussing what the thread topic aimed to try to discuss. Since certain members have decided, yet again, to hijack a thread because they have an ax to grind against staff and have derailed this thread, this thread is now closed.