Oh, ffs... alright, then. Are you even aware that most of your responses to me all over this forum have been pretty much exactly that? Your "major posted errors of fact and logic both". You really haven't done a damned thing to back them up, though, you seem more committed to following me around telling me I'm wrong. About, well... pretty much everything. That's rather annoying, but the question arises: What exactly is it you want? With regard to you, for example, yes. You're an annoying little git who really doesn't have much to actually say, but spends a whole lot of time talking. Yes, I would hope so. I would also hope that it be noticed those standards vary considerably depending on who is addressing me and what they actually have to say. I've noticed you're fairly consistent, though. Case in point, by way of example in this thread alone. Actually, I didn't dismiss it at all. I did dismiss it as a factor of primary importance in itself, though, which apparently offended you. If you want to try to introduce it as the most important factor and then go on for pages about who I'm <insert a dozen synonyms for "you're an idiot" here> then yes, I'm going to insult your posting style. If you're going to do that, at least make it entertaining. And do have an actual supportable point to go along with it. You know, I've read that twice and I still can't quite figure out whether or not you think this is a worthwhile response. I certainly haven't gone into any real argument as to my opinion on this superiority of one governmental type over another, because, after all, that isn't what this thread is about. Looks like you're posting "you're wrong, you fucking idiot" with a thesaurus handy so you can use as many synonyms as possible to be insulting without actually saying "fuck" or any real argument as to why you think that. Result just looks like a mess, to me.