How Do You Report Encyclopedia Trolls

You are the on who kept revising my article to the vandalized version when I kept putting it back to normal, then proceed to act innocent as if your version is not a total farce vandalization of my article.
Who's the dick now?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Actually several of us did, not just me, becasue we all knew the article was broadly true.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

2 of them are facts. figure out which 2 are, and you get a prize.
you are a whiney bitch, thats all there is to it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A broadly true article is not the same as an accurate and correct article. My article revision was simply that I am a member. It was 2 lines and completely true and legitimate. And all of the trolls were repeatedly taking off the legitimate article, and putting in the "broadly true" article which just happened to include malicious content about me.

As you notice, I do not go around doing that to other people for no reason. I do not go around vandalizing people's articles at random. Broadly true or not, it was illegitimate, and continueing to impose it over my legitimate revision is completely obnoxious and uncalled for.

 

ill direct you to what you have done to others' pages.
'nuff said.

 

What is your point? The only reason I did it is because they started with me first. I never trolled any page that was not some asshole that was vandalizing my aricle.

 

No, but its mostly true. And you took out the true bits along with whatever else.

 

I took out the entire trash vandalized article that was not mostly true. It was full of trash, and inconsistent citations leading to posts taken out of connotation.
You took out an entirely legitimate article for no reason, and replaced it with the vandalized version. TOTAL TROLL BEHAVIOR. Then repeatedly did it over and over and over again.

 

There was perhaps one (the baby dangling) , but everything else was totally true.

Did we take this out of context?

 

If you are full of trash then of course anything descriptive written about you will reflect that.

 

More bollocks.

 

No it wasn't. I already typed in the correct information here within this thread. None of that was in the article.

 

I'll make a note of that about yourself.
HAHAHAHA!!!!

 

Those are all legitimate arguments, but I guess you do not know how to read correctly.

 

You mean Bells and Baron? Yes all bollocks.
HAHAHAHA!!!!

 

Why then, do you continue to make an ass out of yourself?

 

And it just keeps on commin'!

 

Meh, just ban him, we don't have to keep that idiot around here.
He contributes nothing to Sciforums, except is being rude to everyone.

 

What are you talking about? Both of those links clearly prove my point.
They try to argue without logic.

 

nor do i.