Immunity and free

We need research on helping the science society to fabricate immunity to death, immunity to age, immunity to disease, immunity to impregnation, immunity to work, immunity to punishment, immunity to animal death, immunity to substances, immunity to teaching knowledge to all including animals, immunity to loss for example recovery of previous deaths brought to life, immunity to being killed, immunity to not having peace, immunity to no, immunity to unfair treatments, free self sustained homes with money food water energy self recovery systems that could be brought for free, immunity to evil, immunity to not having no money, immunity to ugly, immunity to not help, immunity to help, immunity to depression, immunity to injustice, immunity to taking, immunity to not taking, immunity to scams, immunity to accidents, immunity to treachery, immunity to bullism, immunity to lost as a whole, immunity to not having emergancies available, immunity to repair if needed if not a documentation, immunity to help before it's something you don't want given to you, immunity to not get wrong, immunity for self and all, immunity to not get what you want given, immunity to dirty that's safe, immunity to lazy, immunity to dirty, immunity to not getting free money when needed and made for everything and everyone for free, free money, free jobs, immunity to power, and any other effort that needs immunity given out for free.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please take the single word as repeating your total post
I am presuming your first post first word We is intended to cover all 7+ billion people plus all other forms of life

So your proposal entails all life forms subsisting solely on inorganic matter

No material engaged in any life PROCESS cease said process (stop the process ie die) and because of death (which you would like to cease) the material engaged no longer becomes inorganic

Correct?

What happens, after a few billion years, when some of the limited inorganic material becomes unavailable to link with available inorganic material to initiate a new life PROCESS?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Just because they can't teach a machine to think doesn't mean we shouldn't teach critical theory to gorillas.

• • •​

The topic post itself is what it is, yet you appear to have actually put some effort into failing even that low bar.

In its way, that's actually kind of impressive. It's not quite transcension, but I'm not sure what to call achieving new valences of failure.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Is it (the total post) even a topic? or a wish list of some sort?

??? is there a religious aspect to such a topic / wish list?

Need clarity from poster

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Gibberish.

This must be either a 'bot or someone who is mad as a box of frogs.

Reported.

 

I'd go with box of frogs

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Really, this raises some important questions.



Is a box of frogs mad?
How many frogs does does a box need to achieve madness? 2? 12?
Is it a cumulative effect? If a 12-pack of frogs has only 11 frogs in it, is it 11/12ths mad?
Or is it a threshold effect? 11 frogs are perfectly coherent, but the addition of a 12th frog triggers some madness effect that sweeps through the box.

 

It's all to do with immunity from madness or immunity from frogs or immunity from damnfool questions, especially immunity from damnfool questions about boxes or frogs.

Apparently.

 

Also questions about - is a box full of frogs madder than a box full of Georges?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Maybe so, but that doesn't really match your post↗.

Think of it this way: You actually put effort into inventing a straw man in order to incoherently challenge what reads more like a bot than any sort of screed.

I don't know; maybe if you'd just left it alone we could have moved it to the poetry thread. And maybe there was some religious aspect to your decision, but it seems like a lot of effort for a dubious and even self-denigrating result.

A thread of this sort will find its own fate. What happens in between is up to anyone.

 

Why does Michael get all the attention from Tiassa? What am I? Chopped liver?
Michael are you sucking up to Tiassa?

 

All my sucking up is exausted down to about currently 1%

The 99% has been divided up, not equally, between 3 ladies I hope to catch up with when I manage to return to Bali

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You put too much effort into the cheap stuff.

Besides, there is also a threshold at which you would seem to prefer something better than the cheap stuff.

It's one thing if our neighbor might occasionally raise up and whoop an aged crackpot touting a quasi-thesis nigh on delusional, but as near as I can tell even that is just about having someone to whoop on. While the sort of bullshitting he does here is more bread and butter, it's not actually useful, and this is an especial example because it fails so badly.

I don't know what to tell anybody about Poe's Law, but after all that Don Quixote it's more like when a botty meet crackpotty comin' through the rye. And if not, we can simply await more coherent communication from the human handler of the account. But it also occurs that we can make a point about how to make a joke that sounds racist, because truth really is stranger than fiction, and every once in a while life provides opportunities to say in all sincere seriousness things that otherwise sound absurd, like, 「That's a bot, not ESL on speed.」 Or was that too much effort for too much subtlety?

Oh, right. Anyway, it's one thing to tilt windmills, but falling off his horse like that is just (chortle!); our neighbor provides an object lesson.

 

its been through a translator
its a foreign language to English

 

Almost on par with the English-language subtitles for Mandarin on Netflix.

 

Mod Hat — Closure & redirect

We've given it over a week. Without additional clarity, the topic post is a string of words about nothing, and the thread is closed for raising no point of discussion.

Redirected from Science & Society to Cesspool.