If if if you have evidence send me the biggest pile of it that you can That will trump my evidence that I have no evidence Disprove I have evidence of no evidence by sending evidence thus stopping me claiming I have evidence of no evidence because I have a big pile of evidence you have sent me But keep some of your evidence or I will claim YOU have no evidence I might (will) just claim you have no evidence UNLESS a big steaming pile of evidence arrives in this thread with a big blue ribbon Now that's evidence that I do not have evidence of no evidence It's evident I do have evidence There's a big blue ribbon tied steaming pile in the thread Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Which has been the point all along. "X definitely exists" has a bigger burden of proof than "X probably doesn't exist" - partly because the latter does not exclude the former.
I was actually able to follow that. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But seriously, I've been reading this site for many years and I have yet to see Jan produce anything of substance. He goes round and round in circles and always winds up going nowhere.
Thanks So the headache it gave me was worth it Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Quora post Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Seems like you are a mind reader and from the Universe size evidence on Google YOU not the claimant YOU have to pick out the dust mote size evidence which have convinced the claimant Ummmm can I bet you won't pick the correct dust mote But you will be encouraged to keep looking Because you will know it when you see it Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I don't care, you had your chance. First it was god is in your head and not mine because I haven't been convinced it exists. Then you suggest we google it. It seems you are running out of ideas.
We all know that "probably" is a fake term that is used to avoid giving evidence of why God does not exist. You also ask for evidence of God, existing like aeroplanes and coffee jars do, to avoid explaining your position. This thread is entitled "Zen regards to atheism, not" Does God Exist ". My question, and dialogue in general, have been on topic. So stop hiding and cough up. Jan.
Obviously you're not convinced of something that does not exist as far as you're aware. . But that's not the point. We're discussing atheism, not "Does God Exist". I've explained, briefly, how I believe God exists. I've gone into greater detail in the past. But this thread is with regards to atheism, a chance to understand what, and why you lack total comprehension of God. And all you want to do is talk about me. Don't get me wrong, I'm flattered, but this thread is about you. Jan.
So: "Don't ask me! Ask Google!" That's about as close to "I've got nothing left" as it is possible to get. And I agree. Google's evidence of God is at least as credible as its evidence of Sasquatch, chemtrails and Santa. Alas, this discussion is not about what Google thinks of God. Google has made no assertions about god, and is not here to defend itself. It is about your assertions, here, and not backing them up with your offer of evidence. You concede by attempting to pass the buck. You confirm that you don't have the courage of your convictions.
