Pre marital Sex - Why or Why not?

Sometimes it is better to get an education on a topic before you pontificate rather than the other way around.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Here:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Fallen off your enlightenment mountain, again?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ever considered what you call me??

Besides, I'm not interested in catching flies.

 

I suppose if things are kept nicely superficial ...

Of course, when one of them then falls sick and cannot have sex anymore, and the other betrays them or leaves them, this shows how much they "click" in every other way except sexually ...

 

Firstly that was very insensitive

Secondly not every relationship is based on sex, your relationship with your parents for instance and therefore that bonding occures in other ways (was reading something which says the same chemicals which cause pair bonding during sex are relaced in dogs when they are patted) however in pair bonding sex is an important part as it activates both the reward pathways AND the pair bonding ones (oxycotin for women and vasopressin for men). BTW just because i say pair bonding there is no reason why it couldn't be to more than one in a poligimist relationship. The pathways are the same in all mamals and most others and lots of animals such as lions bond with a group of females

 

Why?

Isn't your wonderful romantic relationship that includes a strong sexual component equipping you with emotional stability, maturity, stability and good reason to believe that it will be "in sickness and in health"?

Red herring.

 

Originally posted by Wynn

I posted AFTER gmilam and you are not reading what I said correctly.

gmilam's question is valid.

Using my post as a counterargument after the fact is not.

 

Come on wynn, you've taken scheherazade's comment completely out of context. Her comment was made to your comment below.

 

I was replying to Bells, and then Sche appeared to disagree with me, and appeared to agree with Bells.
It appears they had the same stance, I then just quoted the most concise version of it, which was in Sche's post.


Do you agree with this

or not?

 

I suggest you double check your reading comprehension. It doesn't say what you seem to think it says. Scheherazade's comment was on your absurd declaration that it's impossible to be compatible in other ways but incompatible sexually.

 

I heard PMS makes you angry.....

 

Your arrogance and naivete is showing again, young man.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Just wanting to be an authority does not make you one. It is necessary to actually learn about these things in order to even converse with others rationally on a topic, let alone proffering instruction.

Your lack of experience in establishing and maintaining interpersonal adult relationships is painfully obvious.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Looked into the mirror recently, old man?

 

Public notification:

THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION FORUM.
REPEAT: THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION FORUM.
Topics should not be discussed here. Everything should be made and taken personally.
This is not a discussion forum.

/Public notification.

 

Marriages can fall apart for many reasons. Sometimes the reasons are not as they appear to the outside world. Judge not.

 

Adjust your sarcasm radar.

 

You, too, need to adjust your sarcasm radar.

And I have nothing to "own up to."

It's some others who refuse to discuss the topic, and instead focus on ad hominems.


The reference to spousal abandonment that I posted had nothing to do with you.
My world does not revolve around you, sry.