Schrodinger's cat , paradox .

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by river, Sep 10, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    In the Physical Theory of the Universe . There is no paradox .

    As assuming both the cat and the possion is real , then the cat will be dead .

    There is no possibilities of anything otherwise .
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    The amount of radiation , assuming nuclear radiation , that the cat is exposed to , is not specified .

    Is it a lot or a little , you can adjust the amount of radiation .
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    Sure

    But not based on Mathematics , in and of its self .

    Universal Mathematics has no logic if it is not based on something .
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    More bullshit.
    And of course doing what you have already been censored for...reproducing a science thread, in the fringes, so you can insert your nonsensical interpretation.
    Don't worry river, I rarely report posters.
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    15,647

    Your rants haven't changed my posts in the last two months .
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    I'm not out to change your rants and nonsense. Others have tried and failed, that's why you are banned from the sciences and have threads cesspooled.
    Keep it up

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    Your so " trumpish " . Just plain stupid . You are just plain stupid pad . Sometimes pad you are an idiot .
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    That's nice river, and you still are banned from the sciences.
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    But Not Banned from Thinking .

    Sciences ban is because the Site needs a place where it can discuss conventional thinking , without my input . It will always be that way ( maybe this attitude will change in time , where they let me in again , I have my doubts though ) . I Accept that and Understand that .
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2020
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    Of course not, but it would be beneficial if your thinking was supported by evidence, or didn't totally contradict and wasn't invalidated by current evidence for mainstream thinking.
    If that's what makes you comfy and warm, then I'll leave you to your illusions.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    15,647

    Give me the Time necessary to explore my thinking , Experiments .
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    15,647
    Give me the opportunity to Search for the Evidence .
     
  16. Morpheus22 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    40
    River, maths is a universal language. Whatever language is being spoken, the same value is being referred to. One, ein, uno. How many??
     
  17. Morpheus22 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Do not know.
     
  18. Morpheus22 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    40
    Sciforumers,

    If...

    1×1=1
    1×2=1+1=2
    1×3=1+1+1=3

    Then is ÷ - ?

    Example.

    ÷=top×10-how many bottoms??

    3÷9=3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3=30
    30-9=1
    21-9=2
    12-9=3
    3 (again-recurring)
    3÷10=
    30-10=1
    20-10=2
    10-10=3
    0.3'
     
  19. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,081
    That's NUMBERWANG!
     
    James R and Dywyddyr like this.
  20. Morpheus22 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    40
    If you say so.
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,022
    Umm, there is also a possibility that you really don't know what you're talking about.
    And that happens to be the case in this instance.
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  22. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,239
    Schrodinger's cat is not a paradox - it's a reductio ad absurdum.
     
    river likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page