They have no proof that it was bigfoot. Just a personal belief that it has to be because they believe in bigfoot. Then of course comes the fact that the people leasing those cabins to them are probably keen to have them return constantly. After all, it is a steady income stream and these people are adding improvements to these cabins. It has every sign of being a hoax and frankly, of people taking advantage of others. You have not provided anything that is even remotely close to being conclusive. You have failed completely to show that it could not be something or someone else. For example, they keep saying they have found blood and hair samples, yet these do not show that it is bigfoot? What about poo analysis? They haven't found poo samples anywhere where they are camping? What are these showing? Or have they failed to hand those over as well? It's all well and good to show some tufts of fur and some blood on a rock and claim it is bigfoot, it is something else altogether to provide those samples to real scientific labs for analysis. Museums are often great for these sorts of things, since they will have samples on record with which to compare them to. They are yet to find a single sample to show it is bigfoot. When you provide links to blogs where the author cannot even get the years of when a so called government conspiracy started, ranging from 31 years to 43 years back, then this is a clear indication that something is amiss and such links you are providing only show a clear sign of absolute paranoia. You are better than to believe in stuff like this. Scientists would love love love to find a new species of primate. Especially one that could function as a link to our ancestors. That would, in every sense of the word, be the mother of all discoveries of our time in regards to the evolution of primates. However, there is no actual evidence that these exist. There is also another issue with bigfoot that raises eyebrows. Bigfoot stories exist all over the world. If such a group of hominids or primates existed, one would expect that it would be in a pocket or two in the wilds of one continent or region. Thus far, bigfoot sightings occur all over the world and they all look the same. Which does not make sense. Because the drift that would have occurred if they were spread out around Europe, Asia and up to the Arctic circle, North and South America, Australia, they would look different. Yet they do not. If chimpanzee species existing on the same continent have very obvious differences from their looks, size, mannerisms, societal groupings, then it does not make sense that bigfoot would have remained the same everywhere.