Telepathy: Thoughts & questions.

I read emotions, and transmit thoughts and gain notable reactions. I can send a lady a sexy thought and get her to blow kiss.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

@ Lakon,

The tournament I came in 19th out of over 12000 was a no ante game. You may think that is an easy feat, but it is nothing like saying i had a 1 in 360 chance of winning that 10 cent game (not 1 cent. 1 cent was how much pokerstars charged, and 9 cents went into the pot).

I did say anyone can register at a variety of websites and type in my name "sleeveless J" and they can see every game I played. If you think you can compete against me simply join Pokerstars.net and I will compete with you in any number of free (or paid at pokerstars.com) tournaments. Tournaments start every second on those websites.

I have had games where I went all in with 2 aces on the very first hand and been beaten. Let me know when you can beat 360 people in any game tournament and then we can talk despite the ante.

I have won 360 player tournaments many times over the years. I have been a fairly steady player for about 15 years now, and do not know anyone personally that can beat me. I do go to live games as well and felt very ill at ease in a backroom poker game when I was walking away with over $500 from the $100 I used to buy chips. They had people at the table that worked for the house, and it was not exactly a casino setting. I do avoid casinos as a rule as I spent an entire paycheck at blackjack as a teenager and vowed to stay away, and they often play for more money than I am comfortable with gambling. I am retired and on a budget. I do not know anyone who can beat me at poker among my friends/family.

So beat 360 people in any type of game tournament and come in first place and I will promise to be impressed, but I do not think anyone here could replicate what I did anytime soon even if only at a 10 cent table. I have also beat 360 people at a $4 table but that email was not as handy as I would need to look for it. I used to print my first place emails and keep them in a duotang to give me confidence.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Just be careful, for if you continue you will over do it and they will lock you up. See if you can send me a message please without typing it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

delete

 

Read my mind!!!

 

For some strange reason, women are drawn to psychic power. They find chi and kundalini energy sexy. I've had first hand experience with that.

In contrast, women are turned off by skepticism and atheism. Except really screwed up women.

 

Mazulu is certain that telepathy is real because that's how the Aliens talk to him.

 

Read my mind.

 

Tabula rasa.

 

Wrong! Try again.

 

If you can demonstrate that in front of people then James Randi will pay you $1 million.

So go on, apply.

The truth of a claim is independent of how many people have believed it, how long they have believed it or how strongly they believe it. I don't care how strongly you believe something or whether or not you think those of us who find the evidence insufficient must therefore be less intelligent, what matters is whether you can prove it. And no one has ever done so in a repeatable, testable manner. You claim you can, you claim it only takes a few weeks and you can communicate telepathically with someone else doing these mental exercises.

You feel sorry for people who require evidence before believing things? You feel sorry for people who don't accept extraordinary claims just on someone's word? You feel sorry for people who care about truth and intellectual honesty in evaluating what is or isn't real? Wow, what a terribly gullible person you must be.

Your claims lack evidence and in fact there's good reason to think your specific claim, about only needing a few weeks of training, is false. If it were that easy don't you think someone would have mastered it by now and proven to the world telepathy exists? Hell, in the early days of the Cold War both the US and Russia investigated telepathy, doing all sorts of experiments and mental training. It all amounted to nothing and thus there's not only no evidence for your claim it is easy there's considerable evidence even if it does exist it isn't easy for everyone.

But maybe you're just special

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

@ Alphanumeric,

People make suggestions such as broadcast a 10 digit number to prove it, etc. The fact is that tuning in on someone you are also dealing with your own imagination and likely interference from other stray thoughts from yourself or others. I have never claimed 100% accuracy.

I had in the past contacted James Randi stooges and had applied. They informed me they wanted a short video that they could poke fun at basically. I think their offer is fraudulent and since probabilities are the ONLY way to actually prove telepathy/precognition at this time, coupled with the fact that they refused to accept probabilities then it would be impossible for anyone to win. I dare them to take my challenge to them, but am not re-applying.

Here is the original experiment I borrowed from in an excerpt from the book "How to make ESP work for you" by Harold Sherman.

I have replicated that experiment many times with various friends ( I recommend 1 hour starting at 2am though), and used similar methods to get people to contact me and others from a distance. I have said it before and will again. This is not hard to do.

@ Alphanumeric (still),

I will agree that there are many bad telepathy experiments in existence. Look at all these cards with symbols on them being some sort of "standard". Emotions seem somewhat critical when broadcasting a successful psychic message, and experiments where students repeatedly choose cards with symbols lack all of that feeling necessary. There are also a plethora of mediums, fake psychics, Uri Gellar's, and phone tarot card readers etc that I can see where there is a complete mistrust of the field to begin with.

I do not think I could get emotional about cards with symbols on them, and the knowledge of what cards existed would also allow my imagination to enter into a reading. Now if you are trying to determine what your best friend is doing at this very moment, and make sure you ask your mind what they are doing now and not something from their history, as if you have access to their mind you may not always view the present. Now predict what your friend is doing (NOW), and write it down and then contact them. It is easier to view something if emotion is present. If your son or daughter has gone to take their driving test you may instinctively know the result because there would be heavy emotion attached to either outcome, that may be a bad example as you already know how they drive, but the point is valid. Using strangers, cards, anything non emotional, are simply bad for results. Any skeptic or idiotic supporter can throw together an experiment that can fail. There needs to be emotion, a friend type connection (I doubt Obama would listen to me), non repetition (like cards so you don't start guessing), and it should work well.

I will strongly argue that people have done successful lab experiments in repeatable testable manners such as the Maimonides Medical Center Dream Telepathy experiments that has defied over 75000:1 odds (apologies as I previously quoted this at 75 million to 1), however I am well versed in what occurred there.

I have spent my life investigating this as a hobby and professionally. If I make some astounding predictions or readings that can only be explained by telepathy/clairvoyance then it amazes me. Many experiments you do in this field are to see what works and what does not work. It is easier to influence someone to do something while they are sleeping for example. It is harder to project a thought without emotion behind it, etc.. It does NOT MATTER IF I CAN PROVE THESE THINGS as far as I am concerned. I have not been aiming for a Nobel prize in Telepathy research, I have been aiming at learning the mechanism behind telepathy. I have seen it work so well and so often that I would never doubt it.

When a new day appears it is no concern of mine whether or not you are a believer. I do think it would be "nice" if a few skeptics did experiments like the one from that book page and thought, "Holy Crap!". But I will not hold my breath by any means.

Proving it means nothing to me. Why would it?

 

Hmmmmm ..

I maintain that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. You continue to make the former but not provide the latter. Folksy stuff like the above isn't even mediocre proof. No matter. I still read your posts with some interest (occasionally).

BTW, your post #37; I agree that the Sherman book is excellent. Aside from the corny title and the dated terms therein, it is still a very good expose on personal psychology, how the mind works, etc, IMO.

 

@AlphaNumeric

You don't mind if I take this snippet? ...

It is excellent when training sensitive people how to deal with those who wish to capitalize on that naive psychic sensitivity by exerting a psychic controlling influence in this form.
There was this psychiatric patient I observed years ago who used an almost identical technique with some success I might add. He would keep a picture of his target on his wall and focus a "mental holding" technique, ultimately putting his victim in all sort of problems. It has to be deliberate and with full intent to have any effect I might add. [A psychic command couched as a question - usually hand written and ceremonially burned - spelling Wicca style]
It is actually the same technique most people who wish to use the "law of attraction" inappropriately. Such as holding a person in mind whilst they are sleeping and projecting an idea or desire, in the hope of influencing their behavior when they wake up. However in most cases they do not intend to control the person but merely offer an influence to their dream state.



You are exercising a deliberate intent in the above snippet?

I am currently building a web site called Psypheno and it is currently under development at http://psypheno.bizzymate.com to do with all things psychic... check it out.. you might be interested in participating in the future some time...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

@ Quantum Quack,

Are you talking about embedded commands as related to NLP.

The snippet you quoted was pretty much a word for word retaliation to something I had said so I do not think embedding commands was the intent. In all fairness I had said I felt sorry for skeptics.

p.s. I will look at your website. Cheers.
Edit: I have looked at it, and it looks to be quite an undertaking. Best of Luck. If you have any programming problems I also make websites, and may be able to help if you have any problems.

@ Alphanumeric,
I feel sorry that life has not allowed these people to experience convincing proof. I am not expecting anyone to take people at their word. Spend a few weeks with a friend trying to exchange thoughts at a certain time each day. Even though you will amaze yourself with the accuracy you are capable of, it is nothing that can be described as proof. This type of friendly telepathy does fair well, however it is open to interpretation how you describe hits and misses. On the other hand you can try to project Zener cards (The ones with shapes), which is completely without emotional investment and open to imaginative influence and get a completely chance rating.

I think of myself as a fairly rational person and use logic in my decisions. I have supervised over 50-65 people in a very commanding workplace managing several shifts in a huge production facility, and if you told any one of them that I had an interest in psychic phenomenon they would think you were crazy. I am not used to people questioning my judgement at home and this may be one of the reasons I enjoy Sciforums. I know everyone here has impressive backgrounds, but I am trying to say that I am not the type of person who makes judgments lightly. I stand behind 2 concepts on Sciforums that any people fail to grasp, one is psi subjects; to which I have participated in and seen a lot of what I consider amazing results, and Cold Fusion which is a real phenomenon and will also prove me right eventually.

I do feel sorry for people who are skeptics about telepathy. It is not rocket science (although you'd prefer that) to do, and when you do it, and experience it, you'll know. If you were in my shoes you would feel the same. It is like someone trying to tell you the Earth is flat. You can argue with them, but at the end of the day; they still think the world is flat and you can only wish they knew the truth.

 

I can access your most vital emotions. I can call to you through authority, and take you to a satisfied state. Knowing authority, and satisfaction I can make people jump for joy before my eyes.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I can read the personality of a man, and tell him of his Loving mate. He will be satisfied, he will even be in a state of euphoria hearing this thought. This will give an obvious expression. I can read the sex (beyond gay or straight, to the point of fetish) of a lady, and tell her we match , prove it with a joke, and she will give me "that look." All on the telepathic level.

Its more than just transmission of thoughts. I can give you feelings; free falling, or numbness.

 

Post deleted

 

I have seen and experienced psychic phenomenon, and I am agreeing with Origin in this case. KXOO is either insane or has taken way to much LSD for 1 lifetime.

 

Kx has schizophrenia (he admitted it in some other thread); therefore, what he is experiencing is likely some combination of delusion and hallucination.

 

Not exactly although the NLP technique incorporates and underlying capacity to psychically influence the subject. This is why NLP is considered as fringe or pseudoscience because as with most things psychic evidence is often unpredictable [the Attraction Paradox as easily demonstrated, clearly creates this dilemma and can not be circumvented with out the "trust" being earned from the recipient] to the nature of the targets freewill [inner sanctuary - analogue - Pandora's Box] and the operators integrity regarding the psychic power/influence he is trying to utilize.
For NLP to be successful that incredibly deep "Trust" is absolutely essential and fortunately human beings are reluctant to trust someone that deeply that has not earned it.
No I was specifically referring to AlphaNumeric's consistent historical use of this technique in his attacks on a persons credibility and competence. I am unsure whether AN knows of NPL but I am almost certain he is aware of the underpinning psychic relationships in what he is attempting to do with his use of this technique.

Thank you kindly for your offer... At the moment my main issue is having the time to thrash out the "site policy/philosophy" issues, regarding editorial comment and onsite marketing etc....

and no doubt Crunchy Cat will seek to discredit my posts as being the ramblings of a schizophrenic...