No he didn't, the incoming data from his first experiment was inaccurate. After 40 more missions, he had a better idea. Science evolves. The psychic spammer are you? He says it wasn't an inside job, because it wasn't. He is smart enough to see why. Paranoid BS, to prop up your stupid argument. People who you previously relied on, dispute other crap of yours, so you have no recourse but to make this BS argument. I've actually yet to see a single person agree with you, so that is closer to 100% than zero, d'ya think? When an idiot assesses my credibility based on an idiotic test, the conclusion is flawed. Yeah, run away from debate again when you get your backside kicked........ http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2949522&postcount=135 And here is where your wall of spam is taken apart ..... http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/ No you won't, you'll just spam your crap again and avoid the difficult questions.