Pretty sure I am not. Not really. You are being broad and wrong. Which is not surprising for you. You are the one whining that there are laws against it. My bad, I got them back to front.. Carrying on, it isn't a restriction, and the courts have yet to treat it as such. In other words, as I noted above, you can be a racist and homophobic twat as much as you want. You just can't discriminate against people. You cherry picked examples of cases though.. It's cute.. Tell me, did you actually bother to read any of the particular cases you cherry picked because you thought it proved your point? For example: Toben had a website which posted anti-semitic rubbish which was not only offensive, but also caused harm. The man is so anti-semitic he tried to call David Irving as a witness to support his claim that the Holocaust is a lie perpetuated by Jews so that they can apparently maintain financial and political control in the West, as well as other reprehensible claims that are not only offensive and wrong, but that also demonises Jews as a group, causing real harm.. Which should say it all.. But you chose this as your hill.. So... The HREOCA found that Toben was more interested in the HREOCA finding on the validity of his claims on his public website about Jews (he wanted them to say whether the Holocaust was real or not and he tried to argue that holocaust denial was a valid field of research.. which the HREOCA found it was not..) and he had been advised right from the start that this was not going to be allowed as a response to the complaint by Jones under the Act. He then basically refused to engage .. Even after they asked him to consider supplying evidence under S18D and basically gave him 2 years to supply it, he did not bother to do so.. Why? Because Toben was using the hearings as a soapbox for his Holocaust denial.. Which was correctly rejected.. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HREOCA/2000/39.html Oh for goodness sakes.. It wasn't said privately. It was screamed out loud enough that it could have been heard by others in the street and next door and was. It was first screamed out at children and then tneir father who had heard it from inside his house from next door. That is why they ruled as they did.. Bowman also screamed out that all black people are the same for all and sundry to hear while racially abusing his neighbours. Did you bother to even read the case? Or do you think racial abuse of others, including children, should be legal? Are you for real? Sattler and his guests, on his radio show, denigrated and vilified the Nyungah people and elders as well as their culture and beliefs.. Not to mention it served to intimidate and abuse them on public radio. Andrew Bolt.. enough said.. Launched racist attacks on Aboriginal people.. Do you think it should be legal to racially abuse and denigrate others because of their ethnicity? Yes. You can be racist as much as you want. You just can't be racist in public. Toben had a website where he vilified Jews as a whole and made various false claims about Jews that were also harmful or could lead to harm, as well as Holocaust denial. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says no. And you are a known bigot on this site and your arguments here prove that. I guess I should also congratulate you on your consistency.