The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,875
    You have a point; this should be under the more appropriate heading of "cesspool".
     
    Kristoffer likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,275
    Are we done here, then? I'll close the thread, if so.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    He never did show his workings
    Only referred to his video
    Sad

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Done
    Not dusted
    Ready for the DO NOT RECYCLE BIN

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [George E Hammond MS Physics] February 7, 2022


    HAMMOND_ BREAKS _THE_ GOOD _NEWS _TO _HARVARD

    TO:
    This letter has been emailed to the following faculty members at Harvard University:

    Matthew K. Nock Chair Psychology
    Edward J. Hall Chair Philosophy

    George A. Alvarez Prof Psychology
    Selim Berker Prof Religion
    Susan E. Carey Prof Psychology
    Mina Cikara Prof Psychology
    Fiery Cushman Prof Psychology
    Jeff Behrends Lect Philosophy
    Mark Richard Prof Philosophy
    Alfonso Caramazza Prof Psychology

    To: Chairman: Psychology, Philosophy departments
    Harvard University, Boston MA

    =========================================================
    [George Hammond]
    Scientific proof of God in 713 words)

    https://tinyurl.com/hjztey4u

    [George Hammond]
    (Scientific proof of God – 12-min YouTube video)
    https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk

    [Matt Faunce posted to George Hammond on alt.philosophy.debate:]
    ...I think this quote by William James fits your theory.

    [William James wrote in 1902:]
    “[T]he theologian’s contention that the religious man is moved by an external power
    is vindicated, for it is one of the peculiarities of invasions from the subconscious
    region to take on objective appearances, and to suggest to the Subject an external
    control. In the religious life the control is felt as ‘higher’; but since on our hypothesis
    it is primarily the higher faculties of our own hidden mind which are controlling, the
    sense of union with the power beyond us is a sense of
    something, not merely
    apparently, but literally true.”

    –William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience,
    Lecture XX,(paragraph 512)

    [George Hammond posted on alt.philosophy.debate:]
    Hi Matt Faunce,... Yes, according to my discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God,
    William James certainly did know what God was. And in the 19th century that was a lot rarer
    than it is today! In fact..............................

    =========================================================

    Isn't that amazing! William James actually figured out what God was120 years ago, and
    now I have found precisely, the exact scientific proof of exactly what he predicted! And thank
    my lucky stars that this philosophy student named "Matt Faunce" recognized it buried in one
    of William Jameses famous "Gifford lectures" from 1902 ! For chrissakes, people think I'm
    crazy and it turns out that William James the most famous American psychologist and
    philosopher in American history, chairman of the Harvard psychology department and
    world-famous, predicted precisely the same thing 120 years ago – – but of course he couldn't
    scientifically prove it – – and now I've found the scientific proof of exactly what he said. If that
    doesn't beat all, I don't know what does ! And I might add here, that we can all be grateful for
    the 1000 man research psychology army who in 50 years using desktop computers in 20
    countries and foreign languages using personality and IQ tests testing millions of people who
    found the data large enough to fill a major library that made this discovery possible !
    _________George E Hammond MS physics Hyannis MA USA


     
  9. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    What happened to I'm not

    ??????

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    George, have you sent any letters to the Vatican allowing the pope's scientists view your work?
    If yes, what was the reply?
     
    Michael 345 likes this.
  11. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Good one

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    foghorn likes this.
  12. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,377
    See post 8. He has written to the Dean of Theology at the Pope's Academy of Social Sciences. But perhaps not to the Vatican itself.
     
    foghorn likes this.
  13. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Social Sciences

    Social Academia yes science no

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [George E Hammond MS physics Cape Cod MA USA]
    ... Of course, years ago, first you have to find a theologian that actually has some advanced academic credentials, not all of them do. The only one I ever found was Marcel Sarot, Dean of theology in Utrecht and Bishop or high-ranking deacon of Utrecht, and you can see the letter I wrote to him here; and which was witnessed by a dozen other high-ranking theologians:

    https://www.academia.edu/15648189/OPEN_LETTER_TO_MARCEL_SAROT_Dean_of_Theology


    Naturally you never hear anything from any of them. You need to be an expert in physics, psychometry, theology, biology, neurology, history and everything else to comprehend this discovery. I am such an expert because I've been studying it for 40 years (I'm 80), after taking 2 degrees in physics!
    ... Fact of the matter is, they don't know any more about it than you do. And they're probably
    less motivated than you are to even want to find out.
    ... That's the story of religion you know, it was only a bunch of illiterate fishermen on the
    shore of the Dead Sea who would bother listening to J.C. ya know. It wasn't the priests in
    the Sanhedrin!
    ... It's only the top scientific researchers like, Hans Eysenck and Raymond B Cattell
    who ever bothered to talk to me, and they're both dead now and there are no others in the heavyweight class to replace them.
    ...I'm getting the feeling that "knowing what God is, scientifically" is strictly on a
    "need to know basis", and apparently, as far as I can see, I'm the only one who actually
    needs to know !! Why me you ask? Because it's the man who has the most to lose
    who actually has the greatest need to know. That's why !
    GH


     
  15. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    George E Hammond what do you think you will be doing in heaven when you eventually arrive there?

    Since you dicovered the BIG BOSS but couldn't get anyone to listen will BIG BOSS be
    • angry
    • sad
    • disappointed
    • OK with it
    • some other reaction

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,434
    So, are you saying a god has decided that only a 'few' should know that it ''really'' exists and that others can just 'believe' it exists? Why do you think a god would do that?
     
  17. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [George Hammond MS physics]
    Don't be idiotic! People have been searching for a scientific proof of God
    ever since modern science arrived on the scene. Descartes searched for it,
    Newton searched for it, and many, many others.
    ...What no one expected, and only made possible by large data collection,
    is that some obscure physicist, taking an odd interest in Psychometry, in the
    21st century, would ACCIDENYALLY discover that all those peculiar
    psychometry models were "cubically geometric" and could be traced to
    the cubic cleavage of the brain, explaining not only the "gods" as the
    13 symmetry axes of the cube at the bottom of an eigenvector pyramid
    but immediately indicating that the "MYSTERIOUS top eigenvector"
    was obviously the "God of the Bible" !!!!
    ... Naturally, if the "accidental discoverer" turns out to be a nobody
    unknown researcher – – NOBODY IS GOING TO BELIEVE HIM !!
    ____AND HERE WE ARE............ with only ME being the only
    man on the face of the earth, who actually knows about this HISTORIC
    DISCOVERY, and therefore the only man on the face of the earth
    who actually knows what God is, scientifically !!
    ....
     
  18. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,875
    You're a legend in your own mind.
    If you are happy in your delusions, good for you, just don't expect us to accept your delusions.
     
  19. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,377
    You might think that: I could not possibly comment.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    WHAT is god scientifically?

    I take the scientifically part is the "MYSTERIOUS top eigenvector"
    was obviously the "God of the Bible"

    Repeating the MYSTERIOUS top one of theses EIGENVECTOR is God of the Bible

    And a eigenvector - In linear algebra, an eigenvector or characteristic vector of a linear transformation is a nonzero vector that changes at most by a scalar factor when that linear transformation is applied to it

    Shortened version, for the top one (the MYSTERIOUS top one) is - God of the Bible

    Would that be a reasonable summary?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



     
  21. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [George Hammond MS physics]
    NO, here's a "reasonable summary":
    ... Look Bubba, looking up "eigenvector" in a book won't tell you what
    it really is in a practical sense. But a physicist like me will tell you:

    EIGENVECTOR = in the most common and important cases,
    an eigenvector is simply a "symmetry axis" of the problem
    under discussion.


    For instance, a football has 3 eigenvectors: length, height, width!
    These are the 3 orthogonal symmetry axes of the football.

    The word comes from the German meaning "stationary, fixed,
    axes" basically. If you throw a football down the field
    and it bounces along, the vector leading from you to the football
    bounces around erratically, but the 3 vectors from there describing
    the orientation of the football are "fixed to the football"
    (length, width, height) therefore they are called the
    "eigenvectors" of the football. They never move with respect to
    the pigskin.
    ... You won't find that in a book, it takes 60 years of graduate
    physics experience to say that.

    In the case of the SPOG (scientific proof of God) the top eigenvector
    in the correlation matrix of all personality and IQ tests are the
    "symmetry axes" of the "data point cloud) from testing millions of people,
    and that cloud is in "ellipsoid" similar to the shape of a football, it's in more
    than 3 dimensional space however, 13 dimensional space in fact, so the
    football has 13 dimensions, and these are "personality types" a.k.a. "the gods"
    (12 Olympian gods for instance".

    ... Factoring that 13 x 13 matrix gives you a 4 x 4 matrix and he 4 eigenvectors
    of that matrix are 4 "super personalities" known as Matthew Mark Luke and John.
    ... Finally, factoring the 4 x 4 matrix yields only ONE final, top, lone eigenvector,
    and the psychologists have NO IDEA what it is or what causes it !!!
    and George Hammond has discovered ihat eigenvector, the top of the pyramid of
    eigenvectors, is in fact, I proven, is the God of the Bible !!!

    ... And It turns out that final eigenvector is caused by the "growth curve deficit" (GCD) of the
    human body, that is:
    _________ GCD = (genotype-phenotype) = the God of the Bible.

    George


    Now you can watch that 12 minute video and know what I'm talking about !!
     
  22. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [George E Hammond MS physics]
    Hey Bubba, you just misread your lottery ticket and threw a million-dollar winner
    in the trash.... bah hahaha...bahhahahabahhaha
     
  23. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    You have to get me passed the first 2 minutes without falling asleep

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page