Theoretical Possibility of "Opposite" Gravitational Mass?

Of course they are mistakes....just as failing to recognise that once collapse to Schwarzchild radius is reached, further collapse is compulsory...that the effects of tidal gravitational forces from within a BH will overcome all other forces including the strong nuclear.....or that the observation of an ergosphere does not indicate a Kerr BH...or that a BH only has three distinct properties.....or that angular momentum and charge are negated over time.....or that speaking of a BH's density is a futile and empty exercise...or even claiming that BH's cannot form. Now perhaps you have recanted on some or most of them, due to your personal hypotheticals and pseudoscience thoughts being demolished, but none the less they were incredible errors and/or mistakes in judgement on your part.
I have been glad though to help out in those departments.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.