Theory of Everything.

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Orion68, Aug 11, 2019.

  1. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,490
    Well, anyone who talks non-ironically about "quantum leaps" does not know any physics. And anyone who thinks that electrons moving to a higher energy state emit energy does not understand the principle of conservation of energy. And anyone who thinks the plural of antenna is antenna's [sic] has no education.

    So whoever he is, he's a berk, basically.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,133
    And cactus is cactthem

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,133
    Write4U likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,490
    Write4U likes this.
  8. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
  9. river

    Messages:
    12,743
    Didn't answer my question .
     
  10. Orion68 Registered Member

    Messages:
    43
    What kind of physical properties do you mean?

    Maybe those following:
    Size: Does not apply.
    Temperature: Does not apply.
    Appearance: Is described in my answer to you.
    Color: Does not apply.
    Melting/boiling point: Does not apply.
    Density: Of a particle itself is infinite, of the amount of particles; unevenly spread throughout the universe.
    Solubility: Does not apply.
    Polarity: Does not apply.

    You have to be more specific in your questions to me, since english is not my native language.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2019
  11. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,133
    If your post was directed to me, the following list are non existent for time

    Visual - none
    Audio - none
    Frequency - none
    Mass - none
    Position on the periodic table - none
    Position in the electromagnetic spectrum - none
    Detectability - none
    All those properties I have missed - none of those either

    in addition to your list

    Temperature: Does not apply.
    Appearance: Is described in my answer to you.
    Color: Does not apply.
    Melting/boiling point: Does not apply.
    Density: Of a particle itself is infinite, of the amount of particles; unevenly spread throughout the universe.
    Solubility: Does not apply.
    Polarity: Does not apply.

    As regards to appearance sorry I don't recall your description

    If you could repeat perhaps would jog my memory or reference the post where your description can be found

    What kind of physical properties do you mean?

    Physical properties is self explanatory and I will take any you care to provide

    Sorry I cannot provide any because, according to myself TIME DOES NOT EXIST

    Hence my request for some other person to put forward evidence, in any form, that TIME does exist

    I will accept a property would be a good start

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. river

    Messages:
    12,743
    Simply its very fundamental physical properties . Physical form .
     
  13. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
    There is the problem. The term zero point energy means that the object has NO distuingishable physical properties. There is no such thing as a zero point particle. There are energy fields of various kinds from which massive particle emerge.
    Zero point energy;
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy
     
  14. Orion68 Registered Member

    Messages:
    43
    The point particle itself is a singularity (infinite curvature) but has no physical dimensions in spacetime (no length, no width, no height) but it does have an influence on spacetime around the point particle. It curves spacetime around the point particle. The amount of curvature on a specific place in spacetime around the point particle can be calculated with the following formula: sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)*curvature=1
    In this formula x, y, z, are the coördinates in spacetime where the point particle has the value x=0, y=0, z=0. The curvature of spacetime on a certain distance from the point particle is less (a fraction of infinity) than the curvature on the location of the point particle (infinite curvature).
    So based on the formula above one could get a picture (or draw a graph) of the bending of spacetime around a point particle, this giving an insight in the form of spacetime surrounding the point particle. Thus the point particle has no physical form but its surroundings do because of the presence of the point particle.

    (Examples of plots of spacetime deformed around point particles according to the above formula can be seen in the article).
     
  15. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,490
    Eh? What are you talking about? Zero point energy means no such thing. It is simply the energy remaining when a system is in its ground state, in all its degrees of freedom, i.e. at absolute zero. That obviously does not mean it ceases to have any physical properties, distinguishable or otherwise.

    But you are right that the term "zero point particle" has no obvious meaning. Our eccentric friend has attempted to give it one.
     
  16. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
    My response was based on the term "zero point particle" which I did not introduce. I spotted a problem with that posit.

    But in response to your welcome correction, what do you mean by "it does not mean it ceases to have any physical properties". What do you mean by "it"?
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,960
    He said "system":

    "...when a system is in its ground state... That obviously does not mean it ceases to have any physical properties..."

    In this case, system simply means the collection of interacting objects that are of interest.
     
  18. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
    Just to clarify, if I have a scale where one side holds 1lb of sugar and the other side holds 1lb of salt, the system is a zero ground state? Is the term used for all balancing systems or only for Quantum-Mechanical systems. where the measurements is made in energy units.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Energy levels for an electron in an atom: ground state and excited states. After absorbing energy, an electron may jump from the ground state to a higher-energy excited state.
    https://www.wikizero.com/en/Ground_state
     
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,960
    You know Ex was simply providing an analogy - as an example, right?
    He's simply making it obvious that things in their ground state don't stop having physical properties.
     
  20. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
    What is the physical property of energy?
    What is the physical property of energy?

    This is what I see.
    Then this:
    https://www.wikizero.com/en/Ground_state

    What are the measurement units of energy proper? The following answers the question;
    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/...HZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?qid=20080507192952AAbiEH9

    I thought this was eloquently explained, no?
     
  21. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,985
    Isn't it funny that two of the most important terms in science are "time" and "energy"?
    Neither concept has any actual measurable physical properties, but everyone knows that time and energy are connected to every physical object or function.
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    12,743
    What is more fundamental ?

    Energy .

    Time is a concept . Energy is not .
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,960
    See this post.
     

Share This Page