funny you should post that. i was just contemplating whether or not i could live as a nudist and not disgrace myself. walking around free of clothing sounds appealing but looking upon the nakedity (pornounced {see?!} "nae * kid * it * te") and the amount of self-control i would have to conjure not to blatantly stare is alarming. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
yeah, don't know about the whole nudist colony thing. sounds bad. moving on, i have hairy legs, i'm hairier than male models anyway. i get very belligerent when i am drunk. and new yorkers would say that i enjoy my meat raw. oh, and nobody would truthfully rank your personality first. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Stare!?!? What about humping!? That would be the hardest!!!!! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
what's wrong with hairy legs (you are a man, right :bugeye: ), a little drunken fun, and rare steak? and my marine did not rank my personality first. but he did decide it was sufferable and worth living with to get at the rest of me. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! truthseeker: females do not hump. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! we stare in openmouthed fascination.
I was talking about males. But who knows? Have you ever tried humping? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
never had a chance. men get really weird if you start making your way round their backsides. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I think it's easy to see why males have a fascination with female asses. However, why is it sometimes the other way, too? My theory: a muscular ass is a sign of dominance and power.
I was thinking more along the lines of ass 'holes' why are you fascinated with female ass 'holes' ? hm?
Actually it is you who missed the point, Nubine was talking about why she had never 'humped' a man, she commented that men are not keen on their rears being investigated, you confirmed this. I commented this was not reasonable given mens desire for womens rears, I thought you'd make the connection and realise that to 'hump' a rear, one has to have a 'hole' and thus the hole is the topic of discussion and not the fleshy posterior. You replied that women like mens buutts as they are muscular = dominance etc, I responded that the butt is not the area under discussion. You reply that 'I' missed the point? how so? What is your point?
I read "men get really weird if you start making your way round their backsides." Ass? And you said: "hehe this is so true, especially given their fascination for ours!" Men are fascinated with women's backsides. Ass? Where do you see "anus?" I was never talking about that. I am talking about NC post and your reply to it.
so when men hump they just wave 'it' around the outside do they Ab? No wonder you're single, you're doing it all wrong.
Ab, you don't need to see the word anus to know that in order to hump a man, that involves his anus, as he has no vagina.
In no way was I discussing penetration, was I? Dry humping? But then again, I was not even really talking about humping. Can't topics change a bit (by my own design) or must I follow your lead?
for f***s sake Ab, you said yourself you were replying to my and Nubes posts, so now you're saying you were deviating and talking your own talk? Well make yourself clearer. ie: "I shall ignore references to male rear humping (anus implied) and talk about flesh extieror (dry humping what ever the f*** that is?? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! ) instead, and should u now not follow this change in direction I shall accuse YOU of missing the point.....I shall then deny all knoweldge of 'anus implication' and insist 'I' was on track with the topic only to later contradict myself by claiming I decided to 'change the topic a bit' . " Cheers mate Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!