Trump: We have to start winning wars again

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Kittamaru, Feb 27, 2017.

  1. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    origin likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,328
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    Thank you. I'm afraid of his very thin skin. He can be easily provoked, like the petulant bully 12-year old that he is. Hopefully he will be impeached before he can start a stupid war.
     
    joepistole likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,646
    Well, I guess we have to start a few, then! Can't win em if you don't have em.
     
  8. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    Well, he does think we should have taken Iraq's oil -- said so several times during the campaign. Maybe he can start a third war with Iraq.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    A war on poverty would be good.
    Alex
     
    joepistole and origin like this.
  10. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    There is already a war on poverty - in many cities, it is effectively illegal to be homeless, and it is illegal to feed the homeless in public (which is, basically, everywhere, as a homeless person has nowhere private to go!)
    http://daisyluther.com/instead-of-h...have-made-it-illegal-to-help-homeless-people/

    That referrs to this article:
    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ma...s-md-church-homeless-fine-20161212-story.html

     
    sculptor likes this.
  11. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    A war on domestic poverty involving the US Air Force and regular Army would present some issues Bannon doesn't want on the table.

    Some South American country that is destroying America by producing drugs would fit better, or possibly a military alliance with the the Philippines to settle a combination drug/terrorist issue. That would have the added benefit of a "cold" confrontation with China, a very lucrative possibility.
     
  12. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    Quantum Quack likes this.
  13. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    (skip the 1st 1/2)



    ............
    If I could say it better, I would.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2017
  14. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    Soo, what war is he looking to win? If I was in the trump administration and wanted to "win a war" I would attack North Korea, Islam is the sure fire way to prevent a stable country from existing after a hostile take over, North Korea has not religion other than worship of the kims, Korea can also be unified with the rich south.

    hum, Lets see what trump says about north korea.
     
  15. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    Japan's and China's problem...................

    Let us find an understanding and consensus on just what "winning" actually means?
     
  16. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Probably whatever funnels the most money into the pockets of the Republicans who stand to benefit from the Military Industrial Complex.
     
  17. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    Beware:
    The ruling class needs to divide and conquer and rule the rest of us, and divisions on political party lines is every bit as effective as on racial or sexual or religious lines.
    Don't buy into that stinking pile of manure.
     
  18. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    Only if someone has allegiance to the Republican Party. In which case they are on the side of the incoming fascist powers, and not among the "rest of us".

    There aren't any other significant Party-line divisions available - it's a two-Party system.
     
  19. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910


    Actually Donald, if you had been paying attention you would have known healthcare was a very complicated issue. Before you go making promises and policies, you had better know something about the promises and policies you are making. I would have thought you would have learned that over the the course of your 70 plus years. Apparently, some people are slow learners.
     
  20. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    going beyond
    racism
    sexism
    (etc...isms)
    to
    partyism?
    or
    politicism?

    Would you rather be referred to as a partyist? or a politicist?
    or
    just
    A shill for hacks?
    or an Erisian

     
  21. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    He's never had to concern himself with the cost of health insurance, for himself or his family. And he probably doesn't give two shits about it either.

    Actually, he doesn't give two shits about the common man. Period.
     
  22. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Unfortunate, but true.
     
  23. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036

Share This Page