...who was apointed by Trump... will be handlin the classified documents case.!!!
Yes, I misspoke on that, the making a fool of herself was accurate though.She didn't have a role as special master
Did you just express that clumsily?
That there happen to be many nuanced levels does not make it "almost meaningless"; it just means it's not simple. Lordy, I hope no one expected it to be simple."classified documents"
Is almost meaningless
There are myriad levels of classification from confidential to secret to top secret and several more above top secret--eg: "no forn".
Perhaps, to us unwashed masses, it's a bit muddy. But that's the point of an investigation - and a trial - with qualified, informed participants.To say that president trump had classified documents is obfuscatory on a good day and meaningless on most days.
Any opinion will of course be equivocal, but there are degrees of ignorance.We will never know the level of classification of any of those documents nor their contents.
So any opinion which we may form will be founded in ignorance.
But, don't that slow you down none.
Good, then there will be a paper trail of it. He can't just do it retroactively, with his telepathic mind.However the president has ultimate declassification authority and may declassify anything at any time.
So Trump may have declassified any and all of those documents at any time.
I'll agree that "classified records" is meaningless in this case, as the charges being brought are not dependent on the classification level of the documents, but on the types of information they contained, and what he did when the government asked for those documents(Which were US property and not his), back. ( In fact, if he had just turned them over when first requested to do so, he wouldn't be facing any charges now)"classified documents"
Is almost meaningless
There are myriad levels of classification from confidential to secret to top secret and several more above top secret--eg: "no forn".
To say that president trump had classified documents is obfuscatory on a good day and meaningless on most days.
and
We will never know the level of classification of any of those documents nor their contents.
So any opinion which we may form will be founded in ignorance.
But, don't that slow you down none.
However the president has ultimate declassification authority and may declassify anything at any time.
So Trump may have declassified any and all of those documents at any time.
Which makes this whole thing, most likely, silly political theater.
enjoy the show
Two points here. First this is an excellent reason that he should never have been president (he's a moron as reported by many that have worked with, or you can just listen to him for 5 minutes and come to the same conclusion). Secondly, there is a recording of him claiming he did not declassify the documents in question (more moron evidence).However the president has ultimate declassification authority and may declassify anything at any time.
Have you heard this recording?there is a recording of him claiming he did not declassify the documents in question ... .
Will this do?Have you heard this recording?
Do you have a copy?
if so
Post same.
In addition, the tapes are listed in the formal indictment. The DOJ would not do such if they did not have them to present in court during the case. In fact, being part of the indictment means they did present them to the grand jury in order to get the indictment.Will this do?
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/09/...idnt-declassify-secret-information/index.html
No actual recording for you to listen to, but includes some of the transcript.
It is not meaningless. If the documents in question are stamped "secret" or "classified", or have some other classification information on them, then the law will specify who can see those documents, how they can deal with them, who they can show them to, etc. POTUS must surely be briefed about handling classified documents when s/he takes office."classified documents"
Is almost meaningless
There are myriad levels of classification from confidential to secret to top secret and several more above top secret--eg: "no forn".
No. It's a simple matter of the facts of the case. Documents were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. Trump had previously been informed that he could not retain those documents, but he did not return them even after being asked to. In fact, it appears that he took active steps to hide some of the documents from investigators, so that he could retain them.To say that president trump had classified documents is obfuscatory on a good day and meaningless on most days.
The contents of top secret documents are unlikely to be published, for reasons that ought to be obvious to you. However, the levels of classification are certainly relevant to the court proceedings. Lots of information on those has already appeared in the regular news media, and it will be presented in the legal proceedings.and
We will never know the level of classification of any of those documents nor their contents.
Only if you confine yourself to a Fox News or One America media bubble.So any opinion which we may form will be founded in ignorance.
Trump was not President when he was required to return the documents, so even if your hypothetical power existed when he was President, it clearly did not exist at the relevant time when Trump was refusing to return the documents.However the president has ultimate declassification authority and may declassify anything at any time.
The facts seem to be that he did not do so. Moreover, he later admitted that he had not declassified at least some of the documents. (See the recording referred to previously, for instance.)So Trump may have declassified any and all of those documents at any time.
You cavalier attitude to democracy and national security in your country is both interesting to observe and worrying, at the same time. If you help to end American democracy by mindlessly following a would-be-autocrat, at some future time you might just find that you regret your naivete.Which makes this whole thing, most likely, silly political theater.
I'm more worried about the 70 million Americans that looked at him and said "I'll have me summa dat!" They - and their toxic ideas - will be around long after Trump is behind bars.Drumpf is the most obvious threat to American democracy I've ever seen.
there mindset becomes more understandable when you realize they don't care about being helped just that the people they hate are being hurtI'm more worried about the 70 million Americans that looked at him and said "I'll have me summa dat!" They - and their toxic ideas - will be around long after Trump is behind bars.
So Trump may have declassified any and all of those documents at any time.
Which makes this whole thing, most likely, silly political theater.
as/re:" So Trump may have declassified any and all of those documents at any time"... Cannon's court is going forward as if the documents are not declassified.
...