Wanna Ban Preacher X?

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Preacher_X, May 29, 2004.

?

Do You Wanna Ban Preacher X

Poll closed Jun 12, 2004.
  1. Yes

    7 vote(s)
    77.8%
  2. No

    2 vote(s)
    22.2%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Silverback Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    213
    He just didn't have the nerve to start a "Preacher X needs a hug" thread.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    But seriously, PX, I have no idea who you are, never read any of your posts but this (I don't recall at least) so no, you have never offended me or given me any cause to cry out for your banning, burning at the stake, or any other horrible punishment that might be inflicted upon you over the Internet.

    So party on, pal.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: May 31, 2004
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Captain_Crunch Club Ninja Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,186
    I voted yes, it seems like you want to ban yourself and I cant see why I shouldnt help you do so.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. alain du hast mich Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,179
    thats it, im starting a preacher X needs a hug section
    actualy, i cant be bothered, so ill just hug him here *hugs*
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. slotty Colostomy-its not my bag Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    885
    yup . PM junior , but without PM`s barking mad style .
     
  8. Dreamwalker Whatever Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,205
    I think you may have made a mistake with this thread Preacher.
    Still, I will not vote.
     
  9. alain du hast mich Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,179
    i think the unholy evil prophet dreamwalker is also looking for a hug...

    well too bad, u aint gettin one of me!!!
     
  10. Preacher_X Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    757
    HAHAHAHAH my evil plan EXPOSED
    i started this thread to see if stupid threads get closed or not. this as you can see is a stupid thread but is not getting closed. all of the other good, disscusable threads that are anti-israeli and pro-palastinains get closed STRAIGHT away.

    COUNSELER COFFEE and GOOFYFISHY are zIONIST scum!!!!

    ok, im only joking, thats not why i started the thread, but i have noticed that and i wouldn;t say they are zionist, just a bit biased.

    i started this thread to see if i am offending anyone.

    and thanks Shmoo, you may think i have done nothing, but everyone else here seems to be biased against Islam. no one including the moderators cares when people like Vienna swear, offened and evn post up offenisve pictures againt Islam but ervyone seems to think PM, Brian Foley, me etc... who are just defending are religion are racist and biased and blah blah and we need to be banned and are threads should be closed.

    the bias against Muslims is same on a bigger scale too really. like when Israel attacks Palastine, creates a refugee population of 4,000,000, or kills 100,000 after all of that when Palis fiht back they're terrorists or when America illegally attacks Iraq beacasue of WMDs and then finds non, then uses the excuse of Sadam even though America supported him

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    and then to "liberate" Iraqis even though if America didnt put sanctions on in the first place Israq would be a rich and modern country without all of its problems... after ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL of that when Iraqis fight back they are terrorists and thugs who dont want peace for Iraq.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Dreamwalker Whatever Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,205
    Come on and try to hug me alain. You just have to bear the consequences

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!





    (Just as information, "unholy evil prophet" is a piece of Sodom song lyrics)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page