Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Ryndanangnysen, Mar 4, 2015.
Hmm strange reply indeed!
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Reported, with a request for a ban.
Well, ok but ON WHAT GROUNDS?
That you don't like the information? That you can't handle the info? why?
seen te video btw? I wonder wonder wonder why!? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Do you indeed?
actually I do, but you don't answer.
Are you going to watch the video then? If not, why not?
Takes one to know one! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
No, you are wrong, and you don't adress any issues.
You just add another Ad Hominem!
Actually look at the way people here react to someone with a total different vieuwpoint. Most that respond seem not be able to handle that with any respect.
I don't think we went to the moon either, I think we went to a planet in alpha centuri using alien technology and to prevent the public from knowing we pretended it was the moon we were on.
So, you think that ridiculing and wrong associations is the way to go?
You are saying things I haven't written, can you please adress the issues itself?
Have you seen the movie? If not, why not?
I suggest that you are allowing your mind to be influenced by propaganda from the internet that is made up in hope of conspiracy.
Do you also believe in fairies?
Science can land a satellite on a comet and you think they could not land a rocket on the moon?
The moons is not interesting, there is no need to go back there and needlessly risk lives, it is very simple.
Thread moved to an appropriate sub-forum
Now , let's see:
Whihj propganada and why do you call that propagande? From the internet?
Well, I have found this out before it was on the internet, so that is a very weak 'argument'
Hope of conspiracy? What do you mean?
Have you seen the movie? if not why not?
This question is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Nice try! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
They can land a rocket on the moon, yes, but they can't manage a manned landing on the moon.
Your reasoning is a bit silly, Because the can put a satellite bla bla they must be able to
build a planet. According to your 'reasoning". Don't you see how absurd that is?
Well, the issue is not if the moon is interesting or not.
For some it is for others it is not.
The issue is that we didn't went to the moon the way that they have shown and told us.
Have you seen the movie?if onot, why not?
I am the biggest said ''troll'' on this forum wit a far better imagination and thoughts than yourself. I have covered your subject you are mentioning in great detail, it is wrong.
So... how do you explain the fact that we can bounce a laser pulse off a reflector purposefully placed on the moon and record the exact time it takes to return, hm?
Oh, yeah, PHYSICS and the fact that we've BEEN THERE.
You, sir, are simply delusional... or a troll trying to stir the shit-pot. I haven't quite made up my mind which yet.
Sure! Just joining in the silliness.
My idea has as much merit as yours.
No. Personal reasons. You see my uncle was one of the people that went to alpha centuri and the One World Order had to kill him so he didn't reveal that we didn't go to the moon. Very painful memories so I just can't watch the movie.
It is also worth noting:
Has anyone found any real qualifications on this "Dr." David Groves with actual academic credentials?
You are going to have to do better than this to piss people off. You are being too transparent in your efforts and just come off looking rather funny. By the way if you want to know what transparent is, just look at some of Theorist-constants posts. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Primarily in essence they most certainly did.
Why you are allowed here in the first place is that the administrator of the forum, being a rather fair, open minded bloke that believes in the right of people being able to express an opinion, has other appropriate forums, for those pushing stuff that is not science. Your continued nonsense since you came here is an example of that.
This thread being shifted to "Conspiracy" is another example of that.
What you need to take on board, is that although you and others do have the right to say what you will, others also have the right to refute, deride and invalidate any claim that appears as nonsensical.
You may then ask, in whose opinion are the nonsensical posts categorised as nonsensical. Common sense, logic, the scientific method and peer review.
You seem to have failed dismally on all counts.
In fact you sound very much like another poster who stupidly claimed that science has done nothing for mankind.
Maybe both you and that poster have a chip on your shoulder in regards to science...Maybe you like that poster and a few others around here have an agenda.
In essence the way I see it is that you along with a couple of other anti science pushers really have a problem.
I would get it attended to and sorted out before it takes too big a hold on you for obvious reasons.
Think you quoted the wrong guy, paddo.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Thanks, corrected...Apologies to origin.
Separate names with a comma.