Memory is understandable but new thoughts come from where ?
Memory is understandable
?the brain only has a finite store of memories and abilities from which it can create "new" thoughts.
finite store of
abilities from which it can create "new" thoughts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology
Parapsychology is the study of paranormal and psychic phenomena, including telepathy, precognition, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, near-death experiences, synchronicity, reincarnation, apparitional experiences, and other paranormal claims. It is considered to be pseudoscience by a vast majority of mainstream scientists, in part because, in addition to a lack of replicable empirical evidence, parapsychological claims simply cannot be true "unless the rest of science isn't."[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
I have no memory of my question until I asked the question . We can detect information by devices and convert that information into pictures or sounds . What laws of physics says that we can't evolve over time to detect the information with no sight or sound ??
mathematical finite ?
... quantitative finite Vs qualitative finite...
consider for a moment 5 renown intellectuals
Aristotle Einstein Hawking Newton Tesla
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology
"new" coming from another ?
"new" coming from the self ?
I have no memory of my question until I asked the question . We can detect information by devices and convert that information into pictures or sounds . What laws of physics says that we can't evolve over time to detect the information with no sight or sound ?
it would appear sowith no sight or sound ?
"new" coming from another ?
"new" coming from the self ?
laws of physics do not apply to parapsychologyWhat laws of physics says
I have no memory of my question until I asked the question
No thing exists without physics , including parapsychology .you have posted your topic in parapsychology
was that intentional ?
it would appear so
note
note
note
you re-directing the nature of my question back around like a troll would rather than getting into the discussion
laws of physics do not apply to parapsychology
you are using a circular self affirming statement as a rhetorical question to maintain your emotional distance.
you think i do not notice that ?
feel free to speak your mind and discuss the subject
open my mind
speak your mind
positive physical human contact is importantGot visitors at the moment
My visitors have now left , so I can concentrate on the subject better .2 completely different things
positive physical human contact is important
prioritize that
Imagination. As I had told Tiassa, you can write a whole book about nothingMemory is understandable but new thoughts come from where ?
Information as we know can be sent via light and as we know some wavelengths of light can pass through matter
ok ...but thoughts seem to manifest in ones own mind
We can have positive or negative
It depends on what subject I'm thinking . In science for example , we have thoughts about science in the way of new ideas . Are they good or bad thoughts takes some time to analyze .ok ...
So, when you have a thought, even though it is new & you have never had it before, you instantly know it is either good or bad ?
It depends on what subject I'm thinking . In science for example , we have thoughts about science in the way of new ideas . Are they good or bad thoughts takes some time to analyze .
Then of course we have other types of thoughts such as angry etc .
I find thinking about what I'm thinking is neither good or bad , more diagnostic .
Maybe giving you an example would be best to explain this .thanks
Maybe giving you an example would be best to explain this .
You are bullying somebody and they lash out at you , anger .
The person you bullied then plots to kill you , bad thoughts .
To add more , anger is not a thought , it is a thoughtless reaction , a neurological singularity based on feelings .
An instant reaction in anger is a neurological singularity , reacting to feelings , the singularity thought based on those feelings .thanks
your example is very ambiguous
person A bullys person B
Person B violently attacks Person A as an uncontrolled reaction , like eating ?
Person B then plots to kill person A after they have violently attacked person A ?
something doesnt sound right
please explain further.
An instant reaction in anger is a neurological singularity , reacting to feelings , the singularity thought based on those feelings .
If either of the example people then plotted , pre meditated thoughts to seek more harsh revenge , then that is bad thoughts as the neuro selective process is active .
Ones own neuro security and neuro immunity is important against our own imaginations and neuro singularity actions .
more harsh revenge
?revenge
then the original act which you claimed as an involuntary emotional reaction was a conscious act.more harsh