Enmos
Valued Senior Member
No, no, I was talking about creating "complaints about a moderator"-threads.
Why am i getting warnings.
- Thread starter John99
- Start date
No, no, I was talking about creating "complaints about a moderator"-threads.
omg....i am trying to help the moderators.
superstring01
Moderator
I can. I can do an IP search as well as an ISP search. Though, I've never bothered.
~String
superstring01
Moderator
superstring01
Moderator
So. . . you find it strange that when you troll and flame in the WE&P subfora you get warned for it? Okay. Well, now you know.
Well, they say it only hurts the first time.
~String
what are you saying?
superstring01
Moderator
It was a tongue-in-cheek reference to how the "first time" having sex can hurt some females. In this case, you talk about how it was strange for you to have been warned for inappropriate behavior. If this is the first time, my point being, the next time won't hurt so bad, or be so strange.
In other words, now you know and know what to expect.
~String
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
I was just replying to Johns claim that he was called names in my forum. Plus I advised him that creating this sort of thread is actually against forum rules. That's it.. :shrug:
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
superstring01
Moderator
:wtf:
Why are you people ganging up on John...?.........?........?
John vs [Superstring + BenTheMan + One_raven + Enmos + Gustav]..=:crazy:
Kira, dear, you should go back and read this thread from the beginning.
This thread was started by John to dispute an action I took. I am ganging up on nobody. If John didn't insult Tiassa, then he wouldn't have been warned. Had he subsequently not started a thread in this forum then people wouldn't have posted their opinions. What would you suggest? It was John who started the thread, in other words, he asked for it. People have every right to post their opinions on the matter (since that's why the thread was created in a PUBLIC FORUM). That's what, presumably, a thread is for. Or, can you enlighten us to as some alternative? Are members of this forum not permitted to state their opinions when a thread is created for just such a thing?
~String
Another thing that seems to be failing you is that the Politics subforums and the Free Thoughts subforums are two very different places.
The World Events and Politics subforums can be VERY highly emotionally charged. People not only take their arguments very seriously, but they closely identify with the ideologies they are discussing.
As such, String adopted a stringent, zero-tolerance policy there to try and keep people in bounds and discussing facts and points of view - not personal attacks.
The rules are very strictly enforced there, and with good reason.
String has slapped me with the rules there, and I didn't argue because I recognize the necessity for it and I respect what he is trying to do there.
It is simply not the same as Free Thoughts.
The World Events and Politics subforums can be VERY highly emotionally charged. People not only take their arguments very seriously, but they closely identify with the ideologies they are discussing.
As such, String adopted a stringent, zero-tolerance policy there to try and keep people in bounds and discussing facts and points of view - not personal attacks.
The rules are very strictly enforced there, and with good reason.
String has slapped me with the rules there, and I didn't argue because I recognize the necessity for it and I respect what he is trying to do there.
It is simply not the same as Free Thoughts.
Bells
Staff member
What is right in this instance? You trolled and in doing so, insulted another member, that he is another moderator is really besides the point. You were given a warning. Your gripe? That he dared use formatting.
You were not right, nor are you now. Even after the warning, you continue to troll. At what point will it start to sink in?
superstring01
Moderator