Really? I am critiquing your presentation style because it undermines your argument, makes you lookl like a teenage would-be wunderkind. And your response? The frustrated grammar nazi. Could your posts really stand up to a forensic examination of your vocabulary, usage, grammar, spelling, etc.? And whether it could or not, in what way would that be relevant to the facts? No progress at all. That has been my position from the outset. What you stubbornly refuse to see, or to acknowledge, is that at this point in the science that is all his ideas are. They are at the edge of scientific development and, over the next few years, will either become part of the canon, or they will discarded. You, with either arrogance or ignorance, have elevated those ideas to wholly accepted science. Frankly, that's just dumb. Tegmark? Why the Strawman? I've said nothing about Tegmark. Nor have I denied that Hazen is engaged in current mainstream science, but great jumping hornbills, what leads oyu to conflate "current mainstream science", with "currently accepted mainstream science". A significant proportion of hypotheses presented in papers today will have been dismissed within a decade, or much less. And, you keep going on about watching the lecture. Not once have you cited any of his papers. I prefer to get my science that way, not via youtube. What frigging rumours do you think I am believing? Let me try yet again to make things clearer - Anything you, or anyone else posts, presenting it as accepted science, when nothing is offered to justify such an assessment needs to be called out. You just do not seem to be aware of how science works. It doesn't matter how well you understand his hypothesis. What is in question is whether or not that hypothesis is currently accepted by the majority of authorities in his field. We are not discussing whether or not it will be accepted, or whether it ought to be accepted, but is it. And you have offered diddly-dee to show that it has been. If I can locate his relevant papers online I'll study them. I might well be convinced that he is correct. That will not alter things one little bit. My view doesn't matter a damn. Your view doesn't matter a damn. What matters is whether these views, his hypothesis, is currently the accepted view in this field, because you claim that it is and then - absurdly - offer as evidence the fact that Hazen is well regarded. Unbelievable!