That's not really a logical fallacy Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Lots of atheists use logical fallacies all the time, when I pointed out the logical fallacy used in threads they get moved or deleted... Clearly you all have no explanation
No, ANY post I make pointing out a logical fallacy is immidiately moved Just go look it up, things like an argument from ignorance No, I don't, irrational as in illogical And how is mine not in-line? Oh that's right, it criticizes atheism Great Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I know, "You're a liar, let's ignore him, case closed" Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Ofcourse it's irritating when your faith is being logically destroyed Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! THe question was completely reasonable, you offered no explanation as to why it was moved, I can point out at least 100 threads favoring atheism filled with logical fallacies, and you'll say "yeah whatever, I don't care it doesn't matter if atheists do it"
Great, remember you're fully allowed to insult me, I can't insult you back, I think you guys should insult me more, it's just funnier and less boring Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
No, not "if athiests do it". I just don't care full stop. Let's just say that the existence/non-existence of God isn't at the top of my agenda. In other words: I just don't care. Also, let's be very clear about this: you are, speaking quite objectively and dispassionately, and putting all religious considerations aside, a very, very, very irritating person. It's just a fact, that's all. One we'll both have to live with.
Then it's a girl.. :shrug: But I seem to remember him saying he was a he somewhere.. anyway, who cares lol
I can't insult you back, then I'd be breaking the rules...for instance when (Q) made the thread "Why do theists lie?" and I responded saying atheists lie I got temporarily banned, (Q) however got no infractions, no warnings, no nothing Right...thanks for re-confriming what I thought you'd say Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
well what more important to you, to bring forth truth to the people or to hide in the shade? If you insult me, than I might consider thinking of no existence of God as a logical fallacy. If you don't insult me, I will continue in my evil ways of atheism.
I don't know what kind of arguments used to said by atheists, but I know that your argument which says: I lack the belief that God exists......(1) is the same as I do not believe God exists..........(2) and the same as I believe God does not exist.........(3) is a logical failure / fallacy. You may not equate statement (1) with (2) or (3), simply because they are not the same. :shrug: Here is another example: I lack the belief that tomorrow will rain......(1) I do not believe tomorrow will rain.............(2) I believe tomorrow will not rain.................(3) No (1) implies that I am not sure whether tomorrow will rain or not. No (2) and (3) implies that I am sure tomorrow will not rain. Alright, bye for now
I try to, but if I bring up logical fallacies the post would get deleted or moved or I'll get an infraction or banned or something.... Saying God doesn't exist because there is no evidence is an argument from ignorance... Anyway I won't insult you, but please insult me, it's a lot funnier and more entertaining that way
Right...but I already exclusively stated that "lacking the belief" is only NOT the same as "not believing" if you neither believe nor disbelieve.... Atheists however do not neither beleive nor disbelieve...
Look. In each group, in each society, in each forum, if a person wants to be accepted and respected, they have to play by that group's, that society's or that forum's rules. This is a science-oriented forum. If you want to be accepted and respected here, if you want that your post be given equal treatment as others, then you have to play by this forum's rules and guidelines. You, on the other hand, want to play by your own rules and you still want recognition and equal treatment. It doesn't work like this.
No, I'm not, I'm doing the exact opposite of what you said, all I asked for was equal treatment...then I asked you how did I break the rules and you offered no explanation whatsoever Can you explain how I'm asking for my own rules? How is pointing out logical fallacies breaking the rules? I never said rules should be for me only (I wonder where you got that idea) Thanks anyway, I guess you can't explain either
