No, you haven't.
You have accused her of false accusation for misogyny. But that is clearly incorrect as you are a misogynist and a sexist bigot to boot. Clearly it cannot be that.
So perhaps you can show exactly where she made false accusations against you?
Not if they’re being emotional
She wasn't being emotional.
Which begs the question. Why accuse her of being emotional when she was not being emotional?
Do you do this to women often, Jan?
If they don't behave as you want them to, or they aren't saying what you want them to say, do you simply just dismiss them for being emotional?
Why are you a liar Bells?
Show me where I am lying, Jan.
And you failed to answer the question. Why are you being so sexist?
You’re in full agreement of a lie
Who is lying? Wegs isn't. I am not.
You are posting misogynist and sexist things (not to mention bigoted and at times racist comments).
So I'll ask again, who is lying and where?
Where in this thread? She said your posts were misogynistic and they are, as all of us have pointed out.
Did I? Are you sure?
You believe that misogyny is interchangeable with masculinity.
You believe that misogyny is interchangeable with masculinity.
Don’t tell me what I believe.
Don’t tell me what I believe.
You've been spouting what you believe for 66 pages now.
From your words, we are all able to see you as sexist and a misogynist.
The irony is that you have spent these past 66 pages trying to tell Wegs what she should believe.
Why do you have to be so dishonest, Jan?
Please answer. If you've forgotten, here it is again:
You tell me. You're the one who seems convinced that you and apparently others, can somehow set her straight...
Stop trying to change the topic and respond to what you are being asked.
Are you now saying that I did not link your posts directly?
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/religion-and-women.163938/page-41#post-3663401
Why are
you lying, Jan?
I literally did not. Here is that post again, where I linked all of your posts, up to page 10 because it's quite nauseating having to wade through your sexism and misogyny, Jan:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/religion-and-women.163938/page-41#post-3663401
Stop being do dishonest and stop trolling to avoid answering.
You’re interpreting my words
No no, Jan. Please, take another 60 or so pages explaining to us how the woman must serve her husband, 'the man', because that is what God intended?
See. You lie.
Why the need to lie?
Show me how that is a lie?
Are you telling me that you didn't go on a little spiel about how you, James, Billvon and apparently I, could help Wegs in some way, shape or form? You know, since she surprised you so much.. What's the matter,
don't like it when a woman ignores you?
That God is Male is neither law, nor behaviour.
Why did you avoid the entire question?
Do you approve of stoning one's sons to death for disobedience, Jan?
The Bible also says that daughters should be killed for pre-marital sex. Would you do it? After all, it's in the bible and you believe it is a good authority in regards to behaviour.
Because I want to know. Why won't you answer it?
Idid.
It means exactly what it says.
What don’t you understand?
I am seeking clarification, Jan.
Why did you word it that way? Was it because you don't believe that she knows masculine men who are not misogynists? Or were you trying to shame her for knowing men who are not misogynists?
As of to say did you really?
Do you have a problem with that?
No. I'm asking you why you did it.
Why can't you answer why you worded it that way and posted it in that way?
What misogyny and sexism?
Already explained and linked. Numerous times now.
Whether you believe that is the case or not is not my problem. Guilty people rarely admit their guilt. You won't be the first, nor the last, to claim innocence despite all proof to the contrary.
You have lied numerous time, that is correct
You keep saying this but you have yet to show where I have lied and about what.
Meanwhile, you attributed things to me that were clearly not the case (such as when you claimed I had shown no proof or evidence of your misogyny, or when you accused me of bringing belief into it, when I clearly had not).
You’re problem thus far has been your aversion to the truth
As I have noted, Jan. Whether you believe you are a misogynist or not is really not my problem. That you are one on this site is my problem.
The lie is established with you because of your problem explained above.
That's the problem. You haven't really explained anything. You refuse to answer questions while demanding others provide evidence and then you ignore said evidence and keep demanding more. Your issue is that we aren't lying.
