Here's a maxim:
The more relevant or complex the question,
the greater is the responsibility of the person asking it.
I want you to refute this, poke holes into it, find ways in which it isn't true, point out any fault with it.
Thanks!
If it was not for the wind blowing in my ear I probably would never have realized this
Here's a maxim:
The more relevant or complex the question,
the greater is the responsibility of the person asking it.
I want you to refute this, poke holes into it, find ways in which it isn't true, point out any fault with it.
Thanks!
Signal said:
The more relevant or complex the question,
the greater is the responsibility of the person asking it.
I fail to see how one could incur any responsibility by simply asking a question. Anyone care to explain?
Like Nasor, I just don't understand this either.:shrug:
I guess the asker needs to state the question precisely to elicit the correct answer.
But the above...I'm not sure "truism" is a good word for it...implies asking questions is somehow dangerous.
In fact it's not asking questions that's dangerous.
When you don't question, you're cruising for a bruising on your assumptions.
Suppose the person doesn't know it's a complex question. As in, I was six years old when I asked my mom how we knew there was a god.
Questions come from ignorance and curiosity, which are both at odds against anything responsible.
Here's a maxim:
The more relevant or complex the question,
the greater is the responsibility of the person asking it.
I want you to refute this, poke holes into it, find ways in which it isn't true, point out any fault with it.
Thanks!
Here's a maxim:
The more relevant or complex the question,
the greater is the responsibility of the person asking it.
I want you to refute this, poke holes into it, find ways in which it isn't true, point out any fault with it.
Well the thing is a lot of people don't . They guard there silos of information for many reasons . Ridicule would be one reason . Looking stupid would be another . Now if someone is an expert in a field there answer is worthy of consideration . I have found it very useful to get 2nd opinions from other experts and weigh the results. Now if it is in a boss / subordinate relationship I typically don't question to much because I understand that the burden of failure falls on the boss . The boss may use you as there scape goat and then respect for the boss diminishes. Brake down in production follows so the boss gets his just do in the end by there incompetence. I can only be responsible for my self and lead by example . The rest is out of my control which has caused Me pain in the past . I have been a serious control freak for a large portion of my life . I know how to stand herd on people pretty good . That to stifles production , The best way I have found is you have to give people the opportunity to fail and learn from there failure . It builds character and they learn lessons not forgotten . There confidence becomes heightened if they realize there mistake and correct it them selves . So it can be hard not to criticize and sometimes I fined it necessary, but most of the time I try to build confidence in someone because the more confident they are about what there doing the more pride they take in there endeavors and that my friends is good for the corporation and the over all health of prosperity. Plus they get warm fuzzy feelings of joy from a job well done . They might even touch them selves with happy thoughts. My favorite was when my favorite employee got happy thoughts ( My wife ) for then she let Me touch her for herResponsibility for yourself.
Suppose you ask a question. Someone answers. Do you simply believe the answer given?
Do you rely that the person you are asking is going to be honorable and wise, and answer truthfully? Do you rely that they will tell you straightforwardly that they don't know the answer?
The more complex the question, the greater is the irresponsibility of the person asking it.