Except GPS is updated onboard the missile every second or so. Zig-zaging wont help I'm afraid.No with GPS guidance the ICBM or cruise missile fired from ship can have a circle or error at target of less than a foot radius. But a land launched missile, trying to hit a zig zagging ship even if using GPS guidance to where the ship was a few minutes ago.
The inflight missel can learn its own postion every second or so, but not where its zig zagging target is. That is why a moving target is much harder to hit than a land based one who´s GPS coordinates remain constant.Except GPS is updated onboard the missile every second or so. ...
Another grain that could do well in the future of American agriculture is Einkorn. It is extremely tolerant of salty soils and is likely to be grown in Utah which has VAST acreages of dry salt pans currently unused and vacant of production.
Should the government DO SOMETHING NOW about an impending depletion of liquid fuel? Of course, and it is...to the tune of 130 million dollars.
Let's examine two different scenarios.Put in solar hot water heating and save hundreds of gallons of fuel oil a year.
Let's examine two different scenarios.
1. You invest 5000 dollars for solar water heating which pays for itself in 5 years, and save 5000 dollars in total costs over 10 years.
2. The government requires everyone to install solar water heating for 5000 dollars. The price of fuel will drop on less overall demand, and as a result, each individual household saves 9000 dollars on total costs over ten years.
Individuals can help themselves a little...governments can help a lot.
Not at all...the government simply arranges that the costs for those who cant afford it be spread out over a long enough time span until the savings catch up.And the people who cannot afford it end up in jail.
Not at all...the government simply arranges that the costs for those who cant afford it be spread out over a long enough time span until the savings catch up.
SUMMARY: Solar gets more than 1000 time more government support than conventional fuels and nearly 14 times more than wind energy!http://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/the-right-way-to-fund-solar-power/3923 said:According to the Energy Information Administration, total energy from all renewable sources accounted for 9% of total U.S. energy in 2011. Solar accounted for 2% of that 9%.
That minuscule .18% of total energy is absurdly expensive.
The Institute for Energy Research calculated the subsidies for each energy source normalized to the amount of energy produced, in dollars per megawatt hour ($/Mwhr). In 2011 $0.64/MWhr was given for fossil fuels, $0.82/MWhr for hydro, $3.14/MWhr for nuclear, $56.29/MWhr for wind, and $775.64/MWhr for solar.
This is how people used to live before the advent of automobiles changed the structure of urban design. Instead of separate buildings for commercial space miles away requiring hundreds of trips to work or shopping, wasting oceans of fuel...people lived in an integrated fashion.
This is a thread about what a typical western city would (or will) look like under conditions of severe fossil fuel depletion. By that I mean very high prices for oil and natural gas...but not for electricity.