Why?
Gustav said:i have the right attitude towards everything and have been flawless in executing my responses...ja, the vicissitudes of life and whatnot
Then death is perfection.
Every single state where Islam was the State ideology has become a Dictatorship. Is it Islam? WHo knows? But the fact remains before their conquest by the Christians, ever single Islamic States was or still is run by dictators.Look again at what I said. Every single state where Buddhism was state ideology became fascist. Was it Buddhism? Who knows? But the fact remains that:
That was trashed the first time you said it, some threads back. You seemed to think that the Japanese fascist state had Buddhism as a state ideology, for example, among other dubious presumptions. And it begged a key question at issue then and now, which was then and is now the effects of a religion - any religion - becoming the ideology of a state. The blinkered horse not just in the race, but steering the chariot.SAM said:Look again at what I said. Every single state where Buddhism was state ideology became fascist.
That was trashed the first time you said it, some threads back. You seemed to think that the Japanese fascist state had Buddhism as a state ideology, for example, among other dubious presumptions. And it begged a key question at issue then and now, which was then and is now the effects of a religion - any religion - becoming the ideology of a state. The blinkered horse not just in the race, but steering the chariot.
Meanwhile, you are attempting to insist that the Shia of Iran are not in accordance with "the tenets of Islam".
We should look at it again why?
The Tendai monks were the greatest troublemakers in Japanese history.
They threatened Emperors with war in 969, 1200, 1201-1299 (twice a year), 1235, 1236, 1256, 1257, 1259, 1264, by marching into the capital city fully-armed, demanding many things whose end was always money and gold and such. The Emperors always relented, fearing them; Regents and Shoguns usually pretended that nothing happened because they feared war with the more powerful monks while fearing the taboo of killing a Buddhist monk more, regardless of the fact that those monks clearly observed no such taboo.
But in 1278 the Hojo Regency finally got fed-up with them. When the Tendai monks swarmed into Kyoto again, they sent troops to meet the monks. A war raged and a lot of monks were killed before running back home to their mountain.
This is the sect on Mount Hiei, whose main temple is called Enryakuji, near Kyoto today, which Oda Nobunaga razed to the ground in 1571. If you can see how yawning the gap was between the sect's doctrines and the real practice of the warrior-monks is, then Oda Nobunaga surely could, too.
The Japanese state with the Nara warriors was a Buddhist one. Bernard Faure is hardly a casual scholar in the field.
That was trashed the first time you said it, some threads back.
No idea. Did he say anything about monks at war?
The Japanese state with the Nara warriors was a Buddhist one
how do you explain this.....
...? you have no idea why?
Exactly. Hence you have the Tibetan Buddhist king who skinned the Banpo if they did not convert to Buddhism, the Dalai Lama who ran a medeival landowner serfdom where 90% of the people were slaves to the decadent 5%, the junta who oppress the minions and tear down churches and mosques in Burma and the Sinhalese who consider the Tamils as terrorists for deigning to question their rights as the Chosen people of the Buddha.
...Correlation....
good enough for me
quote the relevant scriptures that you hold to correlate to the type of activities that you describe