Are we made in God's image?

You are lucky I am still here..it's Saturday I thought it was Friday...the curse of a lazy life style.
A Seniors moment Alex, don't let it worry you. Remember, we are there, the young turks have yet to get there!!
OK it's an arguement from authority and yet you have not won in so far as it is your loss missing the wonderful three part presentation by a Professor of Harvard specialising in the subject and actually learn about what you so stupidly dismiss..
As is recognised, nothing wrong with an argument from any professional relevant authority, in fact it needs those links as often as possible.
I wouldn't worry about winning either. Unlike Jan and Seti, whose qualities only indulged ID and creationism, Vociferous's fanatical "qualities" appear going on his posts, extend to much more, including guns, redneckary and all that it entails. Sad.
 
Not many people do have any idea of what you say, other then your general whinging and trolling, which may explain why you are unpopular?

Ad Hominem Ad Nauseam...

Again, Paddoboy, I truly and honestly feel sorry for you.
In your own words and another example of whinging .....
Seems like that sentiment might also be true on this Forum : If there were no unpopular Members on SciForums, how could all of the little bullies validate their miserable existence?

Since I have never ever been popular in any sense of the word...and considering my standing on this seemingly puerile Pop-Science Forum...well...just possibly all of the little bullies have to try to validate their miserable existence...so...
 
You're starting with a living organism and then, what, just claiming it's only a "set of chemicals"? Doesn't fly as science
And how do you know that this organism is alive? A filum is not a living organism, a flagellum is a purely chemical motor. The motility it affords becomes part of the gradual emergence of "living" organisms. You won't be able to tell when and where that happened, except for the hard fact that it did.

5. Microtubules in E nucleofilum
(Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical Encyclopedia,
Wikipedia).
fi·lum, noun
A threadlike anatomical structure; a filament.[/quote]
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/filum

Starting with a set of bio-chemicals that can divide and acquire motility begin to behave as living organisms. That is the abiogenetic bridge between purely dynamical chemical behavior and abiogenesis to a living organism. The rest is just evolution by natural selection.

Chemical Approaches to Dynamically Modulate the Properties of Synthetic Matrices
mz-2018-00808z_0007.gif

As knowledge about the dynamic nature of tissues within the human body has increased, the need for cell culture models that mimic the properties of these dynamic microenvironments has grown. Hydrogels are useful platforms for investigating cellular responses to microenvironment cues in disease and regeneration processes and recently have been designed to contain dynamic bonds to regulate the mechanical and biochemical properties of the matrix in three-dimensional cell culture applications.
In this Viewpoint, we highlight recent advances in developing hydrogels with dynamic properties for modeling aspects of human tissues, providing control over the properties of the synthetic matrix on multiple length and time scales, and their application for understanding or directing cell response.
We conclude by discussing how orthogonal chemistries can be utilized to design dynamic hydrogel platforms for controlling both the mechanical and biochemical environment, affording opportunities to investigate more complex questions associated with disease progression and tissue regeneration.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00808


It is when a dynamical bio-chemical pattern becomes self-sustaining and is able to self-duplicate (procreate), that it may be called a living organism. It's not that difficult to envision.
 
Last edited:
You're starting with a living organism and then, what, just claiming it's only a "set of chemicals"? Doesn't fly as science.
And how do you know that this organism is alive? A filum is not a living organism, a flagellum is a purely chemical motor. The motility it affords becomes part of the gradual emergence of "living" organisms. You won't be able to tell when and where that happened, except for the hard fact that it did.

5. Microtubules in E nucleofilum
(Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical Encyclopedia,
Wikipedia).
fi·lum, noun
A threadlike anatomical structure; a filament.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/filum

Starting with a set of bio-chemicals that can divide and acquire motility begin to behave as living organisms. That is the abiogenetic bridge between purely dynamical chemical behavior and abiogenesis to a living organism. The rest is just evolution by natural selection.
LOL! Thank you for that. I needed a laugh.

To be fair, it is true that filum are not living organisms. At least you got that much right. But your video showed the filum of multinucleated eukaryotic cells, which are living organisms. The axopodia were not isolated from a living organism. So it seems your understanding of the science you cite is woefully inadequate.

Yes, filum are the thread-like anatomical structures of the living eukaryotic cells in your cited video, which never once shows solely chemical behavior independent of a living organism.

As knowledge about the dynamic nature of tissues within the human body has increased, the need for cell culture models that mimic the properties of these dynamic microenvironments has grown. Hydrogels are useful platforms for investigating cellular responses to microenvironment cues in disease and regeneration processes and recently have been designed to contain dynamic bonds to regulate the mechanical and biochemical properties of the matrix in three-dimensional cell culture applications.

In this Viewpoint, we highlight recent advances in developing hydrogels with dynamic properties for modeling aspects of human tissues, providing control over the properties of the synthetic matrix on multiple length and time scales, and their application for understanding or directing cell response.

We conclude by discussing how orthogonal chemistries can be utilized to design dynamic hydrogel platforms for controlling both the mechanical and biochemical environment, affording opportunities to investigate more complex questions associated with disease progression and tissue regeneration.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00808
Again, LOL! Hydrogels simulate the chemical environment of living cells to investigate how living cells respond to differences in their environment. Modeling controllable aspects of human tissue is just a simulation of what living cells respond to. It has nothing to do with creating life in a lab. Hydrogels are just polymer chains that are attracted to and dissolved in water. You do know that polymers aren't alive, right?

It is when a dynamical bio-chemical pattern becomes self-sustaining and is able to self-duplicate (procreate), that it may be called a living organism. It's not that difficult to envision.
No, all you've done is conclusively proven your dearth of scientific understanding on the subject. Take some real classes.
 
LOL! Thank you for that. I needed a laugh.

To be fair, it is true that filum are not living organisms. At least you got that much right. But your video showed the filum of multinucleated eukaryotic cells, which are living organisms. The axopodia were not isolated from a living organism. So it seems your understanding of the science you cite is woefully inadequate.

Yes, filum are the thread-like anatomical structures of the living eukaryotic cells in your cited video, which never once shows solely chemical behavior independent of a living organism.


Again, LOL! Hydrogels simulate the chemical environment of living cells to investigate how living cells respond to differences in their environment. Modeling controllable aspects of human tissue is just a simulation of what living cells respond to. It has nothing to do with creating life in a lab. Hydrogels are just polymer chains that are attracted to and dissolved in water. You do know that polymers aren't alive, right?


No, all you've done is conclusively proven your dearth of scientific understanding on the subject. Take some real classes.
Yet funnily enough, none of your smart arse mockery, sarcasm, and arrogance invalidates in any way, the facts that your spaghetti monster is a mythical superfluous, invention by ancient man.
“The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of starstuff.”
― Carl Sagan, Cosmos


"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”
― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark


“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark


“The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space.”
― Carl Sagan, Contact
 
LOL! Thank you for that. I needed a laugh.

To be fair, it is true that filum are not living organisms. At least you got that much right. But your video showed the filum of multinucleated eukaryotic cells, which are living organisms. The axopodia were not isolated from a living organism. So it seems your understanding of the science you cite is woefully inadequate.

Yes, filum are the thread-like anatomical structures of the living eukaryotic cells in your cited video, which never once shows solely chemical behavior independent of a living organism.


Again, LOL! Hydrogels simulate the chemical environment of living cells to investigate how living cells respond to differences in their environment. Modeling controllable aspects of human tissue is just a simulation of what living cells respond to. It has nothing to do with creating life in a lab. Hydrogels are just polymer chains that are attracted to and dissolved in water. You do know that polymers aren't alive, right?


No, all you've done is conclusively proven your dearth of scientific understanding on the subject. Take some real classes.
Jeez!

Why should you even care whether God exists or not?
 
Jeez!

Why should you even care whether God exists or not?

Personally I don't

Problem. Lots of people do. If it stopped there all would be fine

Problem. It doesn't. My god has rules about how I should live and you should follow my god rules

Problem becomes big problem. I do not have to follow rules which are not law

We will make our god rules, which are his LAW, into puny Minion law

001 My rules.png
(Looks nothing like Russell Crowe)

Big problem just became massive problem

NOW I care

If only religious people didn't care about us not living by gods law

:)
 
Personally I don't

Problem. Lots of people do. If it stopped there all would be fine

Problem. It doesn't. My god has rules about how I should live and you should follow my god rules

Problem becomes big problem. I do not have to follow rules which are not law

We will make our god rules, which are his LAW, into puny Minion law

View attachment 3485
(Looks nothing like Russell Crowe)

Big problem just became massive problem

NOW I care

If only religious people didn't care about us not living by gods law

:)
Regarding the ten commandments, I've heard that in the Vatican they have before and after documents locked away of the number of shagfest orgies.
 
About the Ten Commandments. George Carlin demonstrated that the Ten Commandments has to be man-made and is basically an advertisement..

 
Yes, filum are the thread-like anatomical structures of the living eukaryotic cells in your cited video, which never once shows solely chemical behavior independent of a living organism.
And which eukaryotic cell is that? E nucleofilum is not an organisms but a microtubule?
The behavior of the pseudopodia are purely electrochemical responses to external conditions.

300px-Chaos_carolinense.jpg
Chaos carolinense, an amoeboid having lobopodia
A pseudopod or pseudopodium (plural: pseudopods or pseudopodia) is a temporary arm-like projection of a eukaryotic cell membrane that are developed in the direction of movement.
Filled with cytoplasm, pseudopodia primarily consist of actin filaments and may also contain microtubules and intermediate filaments.[1][2] Pseudopods are used for motility and ingestion. They are often found in amoebas.
Via extracellular cue,
To move towards a target, the cell uses chemotaxis. It senses extracellular signalling molecules, chemo-attractants (e.g. cAMP for Dictyostelium cells[10]), to extend pseudopodia at the membrane area facing the source of these molecules.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudopodia

p.s. bacteria actually communicate via a chemical language, as do non-living viruses.
This mode of chemical communication is called "quorum sensing" and you do not have to be alive to react to chemical "messages".

OK, Eukaryotic cells are 'barely" alive, they evolved from the Prokaryotic cells that came before and are even closer
to non-living purely dynamic chemical patterns.

Anything more primitive than that gets into the bacteria and viruses and viruses are not considered alive . There is you missing link!!

Bacterial Cell
Prokaryotic cells are simple in structure, with no recognizable organelles. They have an outer cell wall that gives them shape. Just under the rigid cell wall is the more fluid cell membrane. The cytoplasm enclosed within the cell membrane does not exhibit much structure when viewed by electron microscopy. Use the following animation to explore bacterial structure.
https://www.cellsalive.com/cells/bactcell.htm

IMO, the missing link between being alive and behaving in a quasi-alive manner is found at the viral stage of evolving life, such as viruses, including Covid-19

Virus
A virus is a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism.[1] Viruses can infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.
220px-SARS-CoV-2_without_background.png
SARS-CoV-2, a member of the family Coronaviridae
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

You see the little portrusions at the surface? In the E nucleofilum, these little chemical patterns are replaced by the pseodopodia. Alive or notalive, that is the question. And if we need to ask that it is evidence that we are observing an intermediate stage of abiogenesis, the emergence of life from non-living chemical patterns...
thinking-face_1f914.png


OK, your turn.
Is this chemical pattern of the E nucleofilum, which is a deadly invader of living organisms, alive or not alive?

If it is not alive but exhibits some characteristics of living oeganisms, then it MUST be the intermediate state from a purely non-living bio-chemical pattern into a living biological biome.

If that's not enough, you'll have to bring something else to the table.

From my perspective, there is clear evidence of an evolutionary abiogenetic process. If you look long enough, this becomes clear and uncontroversial.

The single question reamaining; Are viruses made in god's image?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top