If Tommy was truly christian it would have gone like this:
TEACHER : Did you see God?
TOMMY : Yes, as a tree, as the grass, and as the sky.
TEACHER : Did you see God?
TOMMY : Yes, as a tree, as the grass, and as the sky.
M-16 said:LITTLE FAATHIMA : Do you see her brain?
TOMMY : No.
LITTLE FAATHIMA :
I know what you mean.Nasor said:Thank you for providing an excellent example of the straw-man argument fallacy
No atheist would claim “I know god doesn’t exist because I can’t see him.” Rather, they would say “I don’t believe in god because I don’t see any evidence that god exists.” Obviously there are many things that exist even though they can’t be directly seen with the human eye. There is a great deal of evidence, for example, that the teacher's brain exists even though she has never directly observed it.
567 said:you all are Phucking idiots (for really arguing about it ), becuase you if you have been on internet you should have known that this false argument has been all over the web and every religions got their own Version, not sure what was M-16 thinking when he decided to make it a POST.
path said:He was attempting to show that the quran is inerrant
spidergoat said:If Tommy was truly christian it would have gone like this:
TEACHER : Did you see God?
TOMMY : Yes, as a tree, as the grass, and as the sky.
Cyperium said:I know what you mean.
I believe God is above science.
Who can measure God?
God should be considered as a unknown for science, they really can't remark on Gods existance scientifically.
Yes, you're right. An idea that is so all inclusive becomes meaningless.TheERK said:Totally meaningless. If God is the sum of existence, then the word God becomes useless and only serves to confuse people who view God as a distinct entity.
Well, if someone gave scientific evidence in favor of God, then I would be happy. But still, they could have interpreted it wrong, and I would get less than I was before if they did.TheERK said:Yet I bet you'd be changing your mind if someone gave scientific evidence in favor of God.
So, if science has absolutely nothing to say about God, why do you believe in God? Give me your reasoning; chances are, it's still based on science, even if you don't realize it.